2020
DOI: 10.1111/geb.13115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are plant community responses to wildfire contingent upon historical disturbance regimes?

Abstract: Background Ecological disturbance is a major driver of ecosystem structure and evolutionary selection, and theory predicts that the frequency and/or intensity of disturbance should determine its effects on communities. However, adaptations of species pools to different historical disturbance regimes are rarely considered in the search for generalizable community responses to disturbance. To explore how the severity of disturbance affects plant diversity patterns, we review studies of understorey plant communit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
59
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
6
59
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is crucial that resource managers understand what factors lead to increases in fire severity over historical conditions so they can effectively utilize limited mitigation and prevention resources. Severe wildfires in areas adapted to largely low‐severity fire can cause substantial changes to the landscape in the short and long term that affect biodiversity, soil stability, water quality, carbon balance, timber production, and recreational and aesthetic values (Maestrini et al 2017, Underwood et al 2018, Dove et al 2020, Miller and Safford 2020). Until now, our understanding of the influence of recent drought‐ and insect‐induced tree mortality on subsequent wildfire severity in western North America has been almost exclusively limited to mesic forests historically adapted to relatively infrequent, mixed‐ or high‐severity wildfire (Hicke et al 2012, Kane et al 2017), but outcomes from those forests may not be directly applicable to drier forests intrinsically adapted to frequent, mostly low‐severity fire (Stephens et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is crucial that resource managers understand what factors lead to increases in fire severity over historical conditions so they can effectively utilize limited mitigation and prevention resources. Severe wildfires in areas adapted to largely low‐severity fire can cause substantial changes to the landscape in the short and long term that affect biodiversity, soil stability, water quality, carbon balance, timber production, and recreational and aesthetic values (Maestrini et al 2017, Underwood et al 2018, Dove et al 2020, Miller and Safford 2020). Until now, our understanding of the influence of recent drought‐ and insect‐induced tree mortality on subsequent wildfire severity in western North America has been almost exclusively limited to mesic forests historically adapted to relatively infrequent, mixed‐ or high‐severity wildfire (Hicke et al 2012, Kane et al 2017), but outcomes from those forests may not be directly applicable to drier forests intrinsically adapted to frequent, mostly low‐severity fire (Stephens et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of α and β produces γ, the total species diversity supported in the larger area-landscape diversity. Although myriad hypotheses have been proposed and tested regarding the relationship between fire and these three levels of diversity, generalizations have been elusive, which signals the need for further conceptual work and hypothesis testing for understanding the variety of ways in which fire influences diversity (Parr & Andersen, 2006;Anderson et al, 2014;Burkle et al, 2015;Kelly & Brotons, 2017;He et al, 2019;Miller & Safford, 2020). In this paper, we test key hypotheses on the impact of wildfire on woody plant diversity in a topographically complex mountain range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Understanding spatial and temporal variation in the fire-diversity nexus is especially critical given the profound anthropogenic alterations of fire regimes across the Earth and their cascading impacts on ecosystems and species, including humans (Bowman et al, 2020;Coop et al, 2020). Ecologists have responded by intensifying their efforts to develop generalizations about species diversity and fire that address the challenges of a fierier world in the Anthropocene (e.g., Perry et al, 2011;Burkle et al, 2015;Enright et al, 2015;Pausas & Ribiero, 2017;He et al, 2019;Bowman et al, 2020;Coop et al, 2020;Miller & Safford, 2020) Whittaker (1970,1972) partitioned species diversity into three components: alpha diversity (α), beta diversity (β), and gamma diversity (γ). α is species diversity at a point in the landscape (i.e., a site), which itself can be decomposed into the number of species (richness) and the evenness of abundances among species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppression of wildfire was the rule across North America for more than half of the 20th century (Pyne 2004) yet fire, including historical fire regimes, is a fundamental driver of diversity in many ecosystems (He et al 2019, Miller and Safford 2020). As our understanding of fire’s ecological role has grown, attitudes toward fire shifted so that, by the 1970s, prescribed burning was used in a number of lightning‐fire‐prone ecosystems (Abrahamson 1984a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%