2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are politicians office or policy motivated? The case of U.S. governors' environmental policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This follows Alesina et al (2006), although we acknowledge that the size of that majority may also matter (Fredriksson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Hypothesis 5 Strong Governments Find It Easier To Pass Climmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This follows Alesina et al (2006), although we acknowledge that the size of that majority may also matter (Fredriksson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Hypothesis 5 Strong Governments Find It Easier To Pass Climmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The parametric approach to RDD uses all elections in the sample where a Democrat and a Republican are the top two candidates and absorbs variation coming from non‐close elections using flexible controls for the vote margin ( m ) (Ferreira and Gyourko, ), where vote margin is constructed as the Democratic candidate's percentage of the vote share (minus 50%) that go to the top two gubernatorial candidates. The approach allows an estimation of the causal effect of party affiliation on the economic outcome by exploiting the fact that the party affiliation is a deterministic function of vote margin (Angrist and Pischke, ; Fredriksson et al., ; Leigh, ) . That is:DGi=1ifmi00ifmi<0such that E ( ɛ | DG , m ) = E ( ɛ | m ) = f ( m ) (Fredriksson et al., ), where f ( m ) is a control function (that is, a low‐order polynomial in m ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with Leigh () and Fredriksson et al. (), I use RDD to mitigate the concern about the endogeneity associated with gubernatorial party affiliation. RDD allows the identification of the causal effect of party affiliation by comparing states where a Democrat barely won an election with states where the Democrat barely lost (Ferreira and Gyourko, ; Lee, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bicameralism) (Fredriksson & Millimet , ), term limits for elected officials (Fredriksson et al . ), and ministerial discretion (Bäck et al . ).…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%