2000
DOI: 10.1353/asr.2000.0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
373
0
18

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 349 publications
(405 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
14
373
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Following this logic and, in keeping with general models for understanding advertising evaluations (e.g. Mitchell andOlson, 1981, Shimp, 1981), we suggest that newsjacking messages work more effectively amongst people who report a higher level of involvement with current affairs. However, and taking this a step further (but also in keeping with the ELM) we aim to establish if recognizing the related news story is a prerequisite of newsjacking success.…”
Section: Newsjackingsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Following this logic and, in keeping with general models for understanding advertising evaluations (e.g. Mitchell andOlson, 1981, Shimp, 1981), we suggest that newsjacking messages work more effectively amongst people who report a higher level of involvement with current affairs. However, and taking this a step further (but also in keeping with the ELM) we aim to establish if recognizing the related news story is a prerequisite of newsjacking success.…”
Section: Newsjackingsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A positive and significant relationship was also found between attitude toward advertising and purchase intention (H3). This result corresponds to that of previous research (e.g., Mitchell and Olson, 1981) and indicates that companies that need to contain marketing advertisement in packages should consider how to improve consumers' positive attitude toward advertising, such as providing the most effective service for the target client (Kotler et al, 2013).…”
Section: Attitude Toward Package Marketing Attitude Toward Advertisisupporting
confidence: 89%
“…To test the success of the manipulation, participants completed the three manipulation check items ( α = 0.98) and were asked to indicate their perceived youthfulness as in Study 1 (Abeyta & Routledge, ). Additionally, using semantic differential scales, we measured their emotional state ( unhappy–happy , depressed–cheerful , gloomy–uplifted , and unsatisfied–satisfied ; α = 0.93; Aylesworth & MacKenzie, ) of participants and their attitudes toward the ad ( unfavorable–favorable , bad–good , and negative–positive ; α = 0.97; Mitchell & Olson, ). To assess self‐discontinuity between current and ideal body image, they were asked to identify the body image that most closely approximated their bodies both before (current body image) and after (ideal body image) they were exposed to the prepared ad in each condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%