2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00508-011-1532-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are renal adverse effects of hydroxyethyl starches merely a consequence of their incorrect use?

Abstract: There is no evidence for the assumption that HES-associated renal impairment may be avoided by accompanying measures. Because HES use does not improve clinical outcome, the question arises whether it should be used at all in patients at risk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was previously found for other HES formulations [8,9,12] and suspected for 6% tetrastarch. [54] The point estimates are concordant and the pooled CI is narrower than already reported in trials, [3,25] improving precision. Sensitivity analysis did not alter this finding suggesting it is robust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was previously found for other HES formulations [8,9,12] and suspected for 6% tetrastarch. [54] The point estimates are concordant and the pooled CI is narrower than already reported in trials, [3,25] improving precision. Sensitivity analysis did not alter this finding suggesting it is robust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The total 6% tetrastarch dose exposures were below 50 ml/kg, and 3000 ml or less (Table 2, online supplement), thus incorrect use was not a major factor. [54] Some of the renal toxicity has been attributed to 43% tissue uptake [53] and perhaps the effects of direct urinary ultrafiltration of less than 60 kDa molecules. [51] Overall, one patient with severe sepsis required RRT for every 16 patients treated with 6% tetrastarch instead of (crystalloid) control fluid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A historical animal study demonstrated a MAP of 50 to 60 mmHg to be the lower limit of autoregulation of renal blood flow. Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated deleterious renal effects of commonly administered resuscitation fluids, namely, synthetic colloids [18][19][20][21][22][23] and normal saline (via development of hyperchloremia). 16 Renovascular reactivity has recently been measured by near-infrared spectroscopy by Rhee et al 17 This study demonstrated that in preterm piglets, renal blood flow decreased to 75, 50, and 25% of baseline, respectively, when MAP decreased to 60, 45, and 40 mmHg.…”
Section: Perioperative Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per general recommendations, colloids are not indicated once these goals have been achieved. [ 28 29 30 31 ]…”
Section: Critical Analysis Of Three Large Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%