2019
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/et7nx
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Science Festivals a Good Place to Discuss Heated Topics?

Abstract: Public acceptance of vaccination and Genetically Modified (GM) food is low and opposition is stiff. During two science festivals in France, we discussed in small groups the scientific evidence and current consensus on the benefits of vaccination and GM food safety. Our interventions reinforced people’s positive opinions on vaccination and produced a drastic positive shift of GM food opinions. Despite the controversial nature of the topics discussed, there were very few cases of backfire effects among the 175 p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, and in line with previous findings (e.g. Altay & Lakhlifi, 2020;Bode & Vraga, 2015;Vraga et al, 2020;Vraga & Bode, 2017), the participants whose initial attitudes were the most negative shifted the most towards positive attitudes (for the most negative third, average attitude change = 0.54 on a scale of 1 to 7, and 0.39 for the other two thirds).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…On the contrary, and in line with previous findings (e.g. Altay & Lakhlifi, 2020;Bode & Vraga, 2015;Vraga et al, 2020;Vraga & Bode, 2017), the participants whose initial attitudes were the most negative shifted the most towards positive attitudes (for the most negative third, average attitude change = 0.54 on a scale of 1 to 7, and 0.39 for the other two thirds).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Authors can also resort to dedicated sections in the scientific reports themselves to formulate their reminders, inspired for instance from PNAS’ “Significance” boxes, or create websites or pages linked to the papers containing pedagogical images and videos. Face‐to‐face encounters with the public, for instance during science festivals or certain radio and TV shows, are also excellent occasions for scientists to change people's minds—including on such heated topics as GMOs, nuclear energy, or vaccination . Contrary to unidirectional messaging typically used in written science communication, informal interactive exchanges make it possible to address laypeople's objections precisely and in real time, and to undermine distrust by showing the public that scientists are just ordinary people with good intentions.…”
Section: Addressing Misunderstandings: Recommendations To Scientistsmentioning
confidence: 99%