2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23275-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Shockley-Read-Hall and ABC models valid for lead halide perovskites?

Abstract: Metal halide perovskites are an important class of emerging semiconductors. Their charge carrier dynamics is poorly understood due to limited knowledge of defect physics and charge carrier recombination mechanisms. Nevertheless, classical ABC and Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) models are ubiquitously applied to perovskites without considering their validity. Herein, an advanced technique mapping photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) as a function of both the excitation pulse energy and repetition frequency is devel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
85
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 However, in most cases, quenching of PL signals by charge separation, such as charge transfer at chargeselective contacts, and by increased recombination rates cannot be unambiguously distinguished, and quite strong dependencies of PL transients on experimental conditions can make the analysis of PL transients even more complicated. [24][25][26][27] In contrast to J-V and PL measurements, SPV measurements track the change in the surface potential upon photoexcitation and give information about the direction of charge separation, i.e., a positive (negative) SPV signal suggests the preferred separation of holes (electrons) toward the sample's surface. 17 For OSCs, intensitymodulated SPV microscopy has been shown to be a valuable tool to probe variations in carrier dynamics due to heterogeneity in the buried surface chemistry.…”
Section: Context and Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 However, in most cases, quenching of PL signals by charge separation, such as charge transfer at chargeselective contacts, and by increased recombination rates cannot be unambiguously distinguished, and quite strong dependencies of PL transients on experimental conditions can make the analysis of PL transients even more complicated. [24][25][26][27] In contrast to J-V and PL measurements, SPV measurements track the change in the surface potential upon photoexcitation and give information about the direction of charge separation, i.e., a positive (negative) SPV signal suggests the preferred separation of holes (electrons) toward the sample's surface. 17 For OSCs, intensitymodulated SPV microscopy has been shown to be a valuable tool to probe variations in carrier dynamics due to heterogeneity in the buried surface chemistry.…”
Section: Context and Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is possible, however, is to measure the impact of traps on recombination via the lifetime of charge carriers. , Eventually, the lifetime or the recombination coefficients will control the open-circuit voltage of a device . The actual defect density may not be such a good figure of merit in the first place if we consider how large variations of capture coefficients can be.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To describe the optical relaxation of free carriers in the perovskite layer, we apply the so-called “ABC model” rate equation where N fc is the photoexcited free carrier concentration and A is monomolecular (nonradiative), B is bimolecular (radiative), and C is trimolecular (Auger) recombination constants. We convert this expression to the following form where N 0 is the initial generated carrier concentration and is the normalized PL intensity. Using this equation with a neglected Auger recombination term ( C = 0) and the experimental data from Figure a, we obtain the monomolecular and bimolecular recombination constants from the fit of the curves in Figure b (see the values in Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%