2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01379.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are soil conservation technologies “win-win?” A case study of Anjeni in the north-western Ethiopian highlands

Abstract: This study measures the impact of fanya juu terraces on the net value of crop income in a high-rainfall area in the Ethiopian highlands using cross-sectional multiple plot observations. Using propensity score matching methods we find that the net value of crop income for plots with fanya juu terraces is lower than for plots without fanya juu terraces. This finding makes it difficult to avoid concluding that while the technologies might reduce soil erosion and associated off-site effects, they do so at the expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a more specific conceptual framework that explains this relationship was not found. Much SWC-related research in Ethiopia is fragmented, focusing on biophysical [18][19][20] and economic returns [21][22][23] of project-based SWC structures. Hence, a more contextual conceptual framework is developed based on the collective action literature, SWC-related empirical evidence in Ethiopia, objectives of the CBWM program, and farmers' expected outcomes of the program.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a more specific conceptual framework that explains this relationship was not found. Much SWC-related research in Ethiopia is fragmented, focusing on biophysical [18][19][20] and economic returns [21][22][23] of project-based SWC structures. Hence, a more contextual conceptual framework is developed based on the collective action literature, SWC-related empirical evidence in Ethiopia, objectives of the CBWM program, and farmers' expected outcomes of the program.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous empirical works (e.g. Kassie et al, 2011;Olarinde et al, 2011;Emily and Tadesse, 2012) have studied the impact of single land management practices on productivity or yield and by implication on food security. The limited studies on the impact of agricultural technologies/practices (physical conservation structures, improved seeds, crop biodiversity) on production risk mitigation also focused on single technology adoption analysis (Kim and Chavas, 2003;Kassie et al, 2008;Di Falco and Chavas, 2009;Cavatassi et al, 2011;Kato et al, 2011;Di Falco and Veronesi, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil erosion is recognized as one of the most serious causes of soil degradation in Ethiopia [34,15,16,35] and hence in highland areas of the country the crop yield and soil fertility levels are extremely low [36]. Continued soil erosion seriously threatens peoples' livelihoods, especially in highland parts of the country, where arable land is a very scarce resource [37].…”
Section: Soil Erosion In Ethiopiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil erosion is one of the major causes of soil degradation along with soil compaction, low organic matter, loss of soil structure, poor internal drainage, salinization, and soil acidity problems [15][16][17]. Soil erosion is a physical process that causes land and soil degradation, and refers to the displacement of soil particles by water, wind and/or forces associated with farming activities such as tillage that eventually results in reduction in soil productivity due to physical loss of topsoil, reduction in rooting depth, removal of plant nutrients, and loss of water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%