2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.00603
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are stripped envelope supernovae really deficient in $^{56}$Ni?

Ryoma Ouchi,
Keiichi Maeda,
Joseph P. Anderson
et al.

Abstract: Recent works have indicated that the 56 Ni masses estimated for Stripped Envelope SNe (SESNe) are systematically higher than those estimated for SNe II. Although this may suggest a distinct progenitor structure between these types of SNe, the possibility remains that this may be caused by observational bias. One important possible bias is that SESNe with low 56 Ni mass are dim, and therefore they are more likely to escape detection. By investigating the distributions of the 56 Ni mass and distance for the samp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our main aim is therefore not to construct a complete and non-biased sample. Such a sample would of course be interesting to compare the average properties of SNe Ibc with the models, but would require greater care in terms of completeness and corrections for Malmquist bias (see e.g., Ouchi et al 2021) and extinction. We take a simpler approach in this paper.…”
Section: Survey and Selection Of Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our main aim is therefore not to construct a complete and non-biased sample. Such a sample would of course be interesting to compare the average properties of SNe Ibc with the models, but would require greater care in terms of completeness and corrections for Malmquist bias (see e.g., Ouchi et al 2021) and extinction. We take a simpler approach in this paper.…”
Section: Survey and Selection Of Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of the mass is ∼ 0.001 M − ∼ 0.3 M with the median value of ∼ 0.03 M (Anderson 2019;Meza & Anderson 2020). It should be noted, however, that lack of the 56 Ni mass in the lower side of SESNe can be explained by observation bias (Ouchi et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%