2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are the Acoustic Measurements Reliable in the Assessment of Voice Quality? A Methodological Prospective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, previous reports demonstrated that depending on the time interval over which the acoustic parameters are measured, the clinically demonstrated effect of a treatment/posttreatment course may or may not be statistically demonstrated. 26,27 These data and the discrepancies between our results and those of the literature strengthen the need of standardization of acoustic measurement methods. This point is important for future studies that aim to compare the impact of treatment on voice quality evolution of patients with early glottic cancer.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Thus, previous reports demonstrated that depending on the time interval over which the acoustic parameters are measured, the clinically demonstrated effect of a treatment/posttreatment course may or may not be statistically demonstrated. 26,27 These data and the discrepancies between our results and those of the literature strengthen the need of standardization of acoustic measurement methods. This point is important for future studies that aim to compare the impact of treatment on voice quality evolution of patients with early glottic cancer.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Indeed, it has been demonstrated that depending on the selection of the time interval over which the acoustic parameters were measured, the acoustic changes may or may not be statistically demonstrated. 19 The primary limitation of this study was the low number of patients in both groups. However, in comparison with other publications, 12,13,16 the current study is one of the largest focusing on type 1-2 CO 2 TLCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Precisely, Holmes et al reported better values of jitter and some F0 parameters in healthy subjects compared to IPD patients, corroborating our results 19 . Note that these authors measured the acoustic parameters through a different method than our own, which may significantly impact the results of the acoustic analyses 20 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Note that these authors measured the acoustic parameters through a different method than our own, which may significantly impact the results of the acoustic analyses. 20 These changes in the vibration process of the vocal cover are still subtle, and they may not be systematically seen in the VLS examination of early-stage IPD patients in comparison with patients with mid-to long history of the disease. 21,22 The lack of sensitivity of the VLS examination in patients with early-stage IPD strengthens the interest of acoustic measurements in the detection of early voice quality disorder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%