2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00208-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are the electroencephalograms mainly rhythmic? Assessment of periodicity in wide-band time series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Bullock et al (2003), increased coherence between two structures, namely A and B, can be caused by the following processes: (1) Structures A and B are driven by the same generator; (2) Structures A and B can mutually drive each other; (3) One of the structures, A or B, drives the other.…”
Section: Fundamental Analysis Of the Coherence Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Bullock et al (2003), increased coherence between two structures, namely A and B, can be caused by the following processes: (1) Structures A and B are driven by the same generator; (2) Structures A and B can mutually drive each other; (3) One of the structures, A or B, drives the other.…”
Section: Fundamental Analysis Of the Coherence Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of EEG coherence between two cortical regions is believed to reflect the strength of the functional interconnections that occur between them [7]. Coherent EEG activity in the gamma frequency band increases during different behaviors and cognitive functions in both animals and humans [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of brain imaging, such activity was initially attributed to the intrinsic 1/f electronic device noise and was systematically removed by high-pass filtering or normalization of M/EEG data. However, several authors have shown that ongoing activity, the major part of brain activity [2,3], has scale-free dynamics -i.e. a 1/f power spectrum [1,[3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%