Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism?

Abstract

When the upper half of one face ('target region') is spatially aligned with the lower half of another ('distractor region'), the two halves appear to fuse together perceptually, changing observers' subjective perception of the target region. This 'composite face illusion' is regarded as a key hallmark of holistic face processing. Importantly, distractor regions bias observers' subjective perception of target regions in systematic, predictable ways. For example, male and female distractor regions make target regions appear masculine and feminine; young and old distractor regions make target regions appear younger and older. In the present study, we first describe a novel psychophysical paradigm that yields precise reliable estimates of these perceptual biases. Next, we use this novel procedure to establish a clear relationship between observers' susceptibility to the age and gender biases induced by the composite face illusion. This relationship is seen in a lab-based sample (N = 100) and is replicated in an independent sample tested online (N = 121). Our findings suggest that age and gender variants of the composite illusion may be different measures of a common structural binding process, with an origin early in the face-processing stream. Keywords Composite face illusion. Facial gender. Facial age. Individual differences. Psychophysics Upright faces are thought to engage holistic processing whereby local features are integrated into a unified whole for the purposes of accurate and efficient interpretation (Farah, Wilson,

The Twenty Item Prosopagnosia Index (PI20) provides meaningful evidence of face recognition impairment

“…Evidence suggests that this approach can produce high-quality data comparable to that obtained from in-person testing [ 46 – 48 ]. To give recent examples from our own research, we have found that online testing has produced clear, replicable results in visual search [ 49 , 50 ] and attention cueing [ 51 , 52 ] experiments, and studies of visual illusions [ 53 , 54 ]. However, we acknowledge that this approach is associated with some well-known limitations.…”

The effect of face masks and sunglasses on identity and expression recognition with super-recognizers and typical observers

“…When faces are altered to include competing identity information, identification may also be severely impacted [ 30 , 31 ]. For example, when the top half of one face (target region) is aligned with the bottom half of another (distractor region), observers' perception of the target region is biased [ 32 ]. In sequential matching paradigms, this ‘composite face effect’ results in observers making errors when judging the target region, often reporting that the target regions are different when they are in fact the same [ 33 ].…”

Holistic processing of facial identity in developmental prosopagnosia

“…When viewed by typical observers, faces are thought to engage holistic processing whereby distal features are processed in parallel and integrated into a unified perceptual whole, for the purposes of accurate and efficient interpretation (Farah, Wilson, Drain, & Tanaka, 1998;Maurer, Le Grand, & Mondloch, 2002;McKone & Yovel, 2009;Piepers & Robbins, 2013;Richler, Wong, & Gauthier, 2011). Evidence for this view is provided by the composite face illusion (Gray et al, 2020;Hole, 1994;Young, Hellawell, & Hay, 1987). When the bottom half of one face is spatially aligned with the top half of another, the two halves appear to fuse together perceptually, altering observers' perception of the individual regions.…”