2015
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are the genomes of royal ferns really frozen in time? Evidence for coinciding genome stability and limited evolvability in the royal ferns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence so far supports the hypothesis that polyploid fern genomes are probably diploidized despite retaining polyploid chromosome numbers (Haufler, 1987;Clark et al, 2016). This argument appears to be consistent with the relative scarcity of documented dysploid events in the phylogeny of fern lineages (Lovis, 1977;Bellefroid et al, 2010;Hennequin et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2010;Wolf et al, 2015), and the recent report of static genome size for more than 180 million years in royal ferns (Bomfleur et al, 2014;Schneider et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Evidence so far supports the hypothesis that polyploid fern genomes are probably diploidized despite retaining polyploid chromosome numbers (Haufler, 1987;Clark et al, 2016). This argument appears to be consistent with the relative scarcity of documented dysploid events in the phylogeny of fern lineages (Lovis, 1977;Bellefroid et al, 2010;Hennequin et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2010;Wolf et al, 2015), and the recent report of static genome size for more than 180 million years in royal ferns (Bomfleur et al, 2014;Schneider et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Nevertheless, these broad‐scale differences in the response to WGD do not exclude a role for other genomic processes, such as changes in repeat composition and dynamics, impacting the evolution of particular fern lineages (Dodsworth et al, ; Wolf et al, ). For example, genome size variation in royal ferns (Osmundaceae) is not correlated with chromosome number (Schneider et al, ), and the genome size of the apomictic fern Asplenium monanthes L . complex and relatives cannot be explained solely by polyploidy (Dyer et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'static genomes' in the royal ferns (Bomfleur et al, 2014;Schneider et al, 2015) and arguments suggesting that chromosome size expansion via accumulation of repeats plays only a minor role in the evolution of fern genomes compared with seed plants (Wagner & Wagner, 1980; but see Dyer et al, 2013). The prediction is also consistent with the relatively small number of studies providing evidence for single chromosome gains and losses in ferns (Lovis, 1977), including recent studies that have incorporated phylogenetic evidence in their analyses, for example Hymenophyllum (Hennequin et al, 2010), Lepisorus (Wang et al, 2010) and the Loxoscaphe complex in Asplenium (Bellefroid et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%