2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00351-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are the neural substrates of memory the final common pathway in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)?

Abstract: A model for the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a disorder of memory is presented drawing both on psychological and neurobiological data. Evidence on intrusive memories and deficits in declarative memory function in PTSD-patients is reviewed in relation to three brain areas that are involved in memory functioning and the stress response: the hippocampus, amygdala, and the prefrontal cortex. Neurobiological studies have shown that the noradrenergic stress-system is involved in enhanced encoding of emoti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
280
0
14

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 427 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(112 reference statements)
13
280
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be emphasized that alterations in this hippocampal cholinergic control of the amygdala are sufficient to produce a subjective appraisal of emotionally laden stimuli that does not match their predictive values for aversive events. In particular, the intensification of emotional memory for an arousing simple stimulus and the concomitant weakening of context learning after intrahippocampal scopolamine infusions is reminiscent of the paradoxical coupling of memory intensification (for a simple trauma-related stimulus) and amnesia (for traumatic contextual cues) observed in human posttraumatic stress disorder (Elzinga and Bremner, 2002;Layton and Krikorian, 2002). Hence, such findings might highlight the neural dysfunction involved in pathological memories based on maladaptive processing of relevant emotional information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It must be emphasized that alterations in this hippocampal cholinergic control of the amygdala are sufficient to produce a subjective appraisal of emotionally laden stimuli that does not match their predictive values for aversive events. In particular, the intensification of emotional memory for an arousing simple stimulus and the concomitant weakening of context learning after intrahippocampal scopolamine infusions is reminiscent of the paradoxical coupling of memory intensification (for a simple trauma-related stimulus) and amnesia (for traumatic contextual cues) observed in human posttraumatic stress disorder (Elzinga and Bremner, 2002;Layton and Krikorian, 2002). Hence, such findings might highlight the neural dysfunction involved in pathological memories based on maladaptive processing of relevant emotional information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In support of this hypothesis, high doses of norepinephrine infused into the mPFC, known to impair working memory, have been reported to induce enhancement of long-term memory consolidation when administered after a training experience (Liang, 2001). Moreover, acutely administered corticosterone increases the expression of neural cell adhesion molecules in the mPFC, molecules that have been implicated in the stabilization of synaptic contacts and long-term memory consolidation (Sandi and Loscertales, 1999); however, prolonged or uncontrolled activation of this brain state such as that found in patients with hypercortisolemia and several neuropsychiatric disorders may be associated with cognitive impairment (Semple et al, 2000;Elzinga and Bremner, 2002).…”
Section: Functional Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also the possibility that repeated assessments may trigger intrusive memories (Pfaltz, Michael, Grossman, Margraf, & Wilhelm, 2010). While frequent assessments had only little impact on pain ratings in patients with chronic pain (Stone et al, 2003), intrusive memories related to PTSD are easily triggered by external cues (Elzinga & Bremner, 2002) and might therefore be influenced by frequent assessment. Furthermore, Chun (2016) hypothesized that the settings in which intrusive memories are assessed may also influence the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%