2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10389-020-01289-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are the World Health Organization growth standards universal? The Israeli children validity study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We defined weight at one year as the weight measurement taken by a nurse closest to 12 months of age (range: 11–13 months). Weight measurements are taken according to a standard protocol that includes weighting the unclothed infant on a calibrated scale and documenting the weight with precision of 10 g. These weight data have previously been examined in detail and validated in a study assessing the Israeli infant growth curve 18,19 . Using the 2006 World Health Organization growth standards, 20 we calculated age‐ and sex‐specific weight z ‐scores at birth and age one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We defined weight at one year as the weight measurement taken by a nurse closest to 12 months of age (range: 11–13 months). Weight measurements are taken according to a standard protocol that includes weighting the unclothed infant on a calibrated scale and documenting the weight with precision of 10 g. These weight data have previously been examined in detail and validated in a study assessing the Israeli infant growth curve 18,19 . Using the 2006 World Health Organization growth standards, 20 we calculated age‐ and sex‐specific weight z ‐scores at birth and age one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weight measurements are taken according to a standard protocol that includes weighting the unclothed infant on a calibrated scale and documenting the weight with precision of 10 g. These weight data have previously been examined in detail and validated in a study assessing the Israeli infant growth curve. 18,19 Using the 2006 World Health Organization growth standards, 20 we calculated age-and sex-specific weight z-scores at birth and age one. We assessed infant weight gain by calculating the difference between these two zscores and defined RIWG as a weight z-score difference >0.67.…”
Section: Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validated weight measurements were taken by nurses according to a standard protocol that includes weighting the unclothed infant on a calibrated scale and documenting the weight with 10 g precision. 35,36 We evaluated rapid weight gain during infancy using the measurements taken between birth and age fifteen months, to also capture the visits of those late to the age one-year recommended visit (Figure S1 and Table S1). We included all available information, regardless of infants' geographic location or birthweight (N = 1,295,893).…”
Section: Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in neonatal birth weight have also been identified between ethnic groups. Thus the use of a chart adapted to another population may lead to the overdiagnosis of SGA or LGA [12]. For this reason, projects aiming at developing personalized growth charts are undertaken.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%