2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00876-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are there any limits for laparoscopy in splenomegaly? Our experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Casaccia et al 14 demonstrated that LS is safe, feasible, and associated with better outcomes in the treatment of massive and giant spleens up to a maximum of 31 cm. However, Santarelli et al 15 demonstrated that a craniocaudal diameter > 22 cm was the most significant risk factor for conversion. This higher rate of complications in patients with MD may be attributed to both the underlying disease (nature, size, and weight of the spleen) and patient characteristics (age and BMI).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Casaccia et al 14 demonstrated that LS is safe, feasible, and associated with better outcomes in the treatment of massive and giant spleens up to a maximum of 31 cm. However, Santarelli et al 15 demonstrated that a craniocaudal diameter > 22 cm was the most significant risk factor for conversion. This higher rate of complications in patients with MD may be attributed to both the underlying disease (nature, size, and weight of the spleen) and patient characteristics (age and BMI).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Casaccia et al14 demonstrated that LS is safe, feasible, and associated with better outcomes in the treatment of massive and giant spleens up to a maximum of 31 cm. However, Santarelli et al15 demonstrated that a craniocaudal diameter >22 cm was the most significant risk factor for conversion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, laparoscopic surgery with splenopexy should be preferred whenever feasible due to benefits over open splenopexy or splenectomy, such as preserving organic function and a quick recovery, mainly due to low postoperative pain and a prompt discharge from the hospital [ 12 , 13 ]. On the other hand, given the risk of torsion, most patients are now treated with splenectomy even when asymptomatic [ 11 , 14 – 16 ]. Indeed, to perform the splenectomy of a WS laparoscopically has already been reported as a save option [ 14 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%