2011
DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2011.554699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are There any Matthew Effects in Literacy and Cognitive Development?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, vocabulary was measured via both word reading and listening vocabulary. In a similar manner, Kempe, Eriksson-Gustavsson, and Samuelsson (2011) reported evidence of a Matthew effect on the growth of vocabulary in the 1st to third grades, as measured orally using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (Wechsler, 1991). In addition, Stothard, Snowling, Bishop, Chipchase, and Kaplan (1998) reported a decrease in scores on the British Vocabulary Scale (Dunn, Dunn, Whetton, & Pintilie, 1982) between ages 8 and 15 for children who had been classified as having persistent specific language impairment and general delay, but not for children whose language was within the expected range or for children whose early language concerns had resolved by age 5 years.…”
Section: The Existence Of a Matthew Effect For Vocabularymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In this case, vocabulary was measured via both word reading and listening vocabulary. In a similar manner, Kempe, Eriksson-Gustavsson, and Samuelsson (2011) reported evidence of a Matthew effect on the growth of vocabulary in the 1st to third grades, as measured orally using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (Wechsler, 1991). In addition, Stothard, Snowling, Bishop, Chipchase, and Kaplan (1998) reported a decrease in scores on the British Vocabulary Scale (Dunn, Dunn, Whetton, & Pintilie, 1982) between ages 8 and 15 for children who had been classified as having persistent specific language impairment and general delay, but not for children whose language was within the expected range or for children whose early language concerns had resolved by age 5 years.…”
Section: The Existence Of a Matthew Effect For Vocabularymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Cumulative patterns, i.e., increasing differences in performance and variance between students over time, have been described by a number of studies in reading and mathematics (e.g., Bast & Reitsma, 1997;Bodovski & Farkas, 2007;Kempe, Eriksson-Gustavsson, & Samuelsson, 2011;Leppänen, Niemi, Aunola, & Nurmi, 2004;Williamson, Appelbaum, & Epanchin, 1991). This effect, with biblical reference, is also called Matthew effect (Stanovich, 1986).…”
Section: Growth Trajectories Of Overall Math Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Varasemates uurimustes on leitud, et laste tekstimõistmise probleemid on ajas võrdlemisi püsivad (Kim, Samson, Fitzgerald, & Hartry, 2009;Nation, Cocksey, Taylor, & Bishop, 2010) ning erinevused võimekamate ja vähem võimekamate laste vahel ajas pigem suurenevad, st võimekamate tule mused paranevad ja nõrgemate omad halvenevad veelgi (Cain & Oakhill, 2011;Kempe, ErikssonGustavsson, & Samuelsson, 2011). Samas on uurimusi, mis näitavad laste akadeemilise edukuse muutumist ajas.…”
Section: Muutused õPilaste Tekstimõistmisesunclassified
“…Põhjuseks võib pidada arengulisi muutusi tekstimõistmise komponentides ja verbaalses võimekuses. Akadeemiliste tulemuste ja võimete dünaami list hindamist on ka varem oluliseks peetud (Kempe et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2009;Mooij & Driessen, 2008;Männamaa & Kikas, 2010;Phillips et al, 2002), sest muutused ajas võivad olla mitmesuunalised ja probleemid selguda hiljem (Leach et al, 2003).…”
Section: Erinevused õPilaste Tekstimõistmise Profiilidesunclassified