Abstract:We studied 160 cases of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) drawn from all parts of India, using multiplex PCR of 27 exons. Of these, 103 (64.4%) showed intragenic deletions. Most (69.7%) of the deletions involved exons 45-51. The phenotype of cases with deletion of single exons did not differ significantly from those with deletion of multiple exons. The distribution of deletions in studies from different countries was variable, but this was accounted for either by the small number of cases studied, or by fewer … Show more
“…Our data clearly shows that DMD deletions are inhomogeneously distributed among our patients. Our observation was similar to other studies like Banerjee, et al [20] and Swaminathan, et al [5] where they could not establish any phenotypic and genotype correlation considering the size of exon deletion and pattern of deletion. Moreover, Baumbach, et al [21] and Lindlof, et al [22] found no significant correlation between clinical phenotype and number of exon deletion.…”
The positivity of PCR- based diagnosis is higher in our study possibly related to highly selective group of patients. Phenotype and genotype correlation was not seen.
“…Our data clearly shows that DMD deletions are inhomogeneously distributed among our patients. Our observation was similar to other studies like Banerjee, et al [20] and Swaminathan, et al [5] where they could not establish any phenotypic and genotype correlation considering the size of exon deletion and pattern of deletion. Moreover, Baumbach, et al [21] and Lindlof, et al [22] found no significant correlation between clinical phenotype and number of exon deletion.…”
The positivity of PCR- based diagnosis is higher in our study possibly related to highly selective group of patients. Phenotype and genotype correlation was not seen.
“…However, there is no significant difference in the distribution pattern among the four patient groups studied from India (0.25<p<0.5). [17][18][19] As the breakpoints of the deletions lie in introns which are mostly free from selection pressure, sequence divergence, particularly at poly dAdT repeat regions which have been found in junction fragments, are possible and may explain this variation.…”
About half the mothers of affected probands were not carriers of the deletion, underscoring the need to use real time techniques for carrier detection.
“…24,25 Variations in the incidence of intragenic dystrophin deletions in Indian DMD/ BMD patients are also reported. 26,27 Mallikarjuna et al proposed that the lower incidence of dystrophin intragenic deletions from South India is suggestive of variations in southern and northern populations. 28 The lower deletion rate (40.75%) in the Pakistani population detected in the present study as compared to that in neighboring India is also indicative of genetic difference between these two populations.…”
The observed proportion of intragenic deletions in the Pakistani population is relatively low, which is comparable with most of the Asian data. Also, deletions in 67 patients (77.9%) are in agreement with the frame-shift rule.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.