Are There Generalizable Trends in the Release of Airborne Synthetic Clay Nanoparticles from a Jet Milling Process?

Abstract

Despite recent efforts to assess the release of nanoparticles to the workplace during different nanotechnology activities, the existence of a generalizable trend in the particle release has yet to be identified. This study aimed to characterize the release of synthetic clay nanoparticles from a laboratory-based jet milling process by quantifying the variations arising from primary particle size and surface treatment of the material used, as well as the feed rate of the machine. A broad range of materials were used in this study, and the emitted particles mass (PM 2.5 ) and number concentrations (PNC) were measured at the release source. Analysis of variance, followed by linear mixed-effects modeling, was applied to quantify the variations in PM 2.5 and PNC of the released particles caused by the abovementioned factors. The results confirmed that using materials of different primary sizes and surface treatment affects the release of the particles from the same process by causing statistically-significant variations in PM 2.5 and PNC. The interaction of these two factors should also be taken into account as it resulted in variations in the measured particles release properties. Furthermore, the feed rate of the milling machine was confirmed to be another influencing parameter. Although this research does not identify a specific pattern in the release of synthetic clay nanoparticles from the jet milling process this is generalizable to other similar settings, it emphasizes that each tested case should be handled individually in terms of exposure considerations.

What are the Driving Factors Influencing the Size Distribution of Airborne Synthetic Clay Particles Emitted from a Jet Milling Process?

“…Whilst the large particles are held in the grinding chamber by the centrifugal force, the ground particles are carried out by an air flow and collected in the product chamber. More information can be found in our previous study (Faghihi et al, 2015).…”

Nanoparticle Release in Indoor Workplaces: Emission Sources, Release Determinants and Release Categories Based on Workplace Measurements

“…A number of research activities aiming to answer the question whether airborne particles could be released from a particular activity during the life cycle of the material have been conducted so far. However, a lack of understanding still exists on the mechanism that governs the release of nanoparticles in occupational environments, and no significant attempt has been made to verify the existence of a generalisable trend in the release of nanoparticles from a nanotechnology process [50]. PNC particle number concentration,…”

Occupational Release of Engineered Nanoparticles: A Review

“…The synthesised material may also be released and become airborne during the handling and refinement phase, which includes activities such as opening and cleaning the reactor [17], filtering [7], drying [13], palletising [6], grinding and milling [17,18]. Nanomaterials in a dry powder form may also be released as agglomerates and possibly discrete particles during uncontrolled handling and transfer.…”