Are there patient-related factors that influence sickness certification in patients with severe subjective health complaints? A cross-sectional exploratory study from different European countries

Abstract

ObjectivesTo develop hypotheses about whether there are patient-related factors that influence physicians’ decision-making that can explain why some patients with severe subjective health complaints (SHCs) are more likely to be granted sick leave than others.DesignExploratory cross-sectional.SettingAssessments of patient-related factors after watching nine authentic video recordings of patients with severe SHC from a Norwegian general practice. Our previous study showed that three of these nine patients were less likely than the remaining six patients to be granted sick leave by physicians from five European countries.ParticipantsIn total, 10 assessors from Norway, the Netherlands and France.OutcomesThe direction in which the assessments may contribute towards the decision to grant a sickness certificate (increasing or decreasing the likelihood of granting sick leave).ResultsPhysicians consider a wide variety of patient-related factors when assessing sickness certification. The overall assessment of these factors may provide an indication of whether a patient is more likely or less likely to be granted sick leave. Additionally, some single questions (notable functional limitations in the consultation, visible suffering, a clear purpose for sick leave and psychiatric comorbidity) may indicate differences between the two patient groups.ConclusionsNext to the overall assessment, no notable effect of the complaints on functioning and suffering, a lack of a clear purpose for sick leave and the absence of psychiatric comorbidity may be factors that could help guide the decision to grant sick leave. These hypotheses should be tested and validated in representative samples of professionals involved in sickness certification. This may help to understand the tacit knowledge we believe physicians have when assessing work capacity of patients with severe SHC.

Interventions regarding physicians’ sickness certification practice – a systematic literature review with meta-analyses

“…Previously, it has been pointed out that there is a need for international comparisons of similar interventions in different countries, as a knowledge base for actions regarding physicians’ sickness certification practice [ 9 , 62 ]; this need is still not met.…”

Patients’ experiences with receiving sick leave certificates via remote consultations in Norway during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide online survey

“…Many physicians perceive sick leave tasks as difficult6 and time-demanding 7. Moreover, they experience problems in assessing the patient’s ability to work,2 8 such as for patients suffering from subjective and composite health complaints,9 10 and disagreements or conflicts with patients,11 especially when the GP denies a patient’s request 12. There is also a moral hazard that individuals request sickness leave more than necessary 13…”

Primary care physicians’ concerned voices on sickness certification after a period of reorganization. Focus group interviews in Sweden

“…A Swedish focus group interview study showed that GPs and GP trainees were positive to include other healthcare professionals in the patient's rehabilitation process [14]. Still, the patients are the prime sources of information about themselves as emphasized in a study where recorded dialogues between patients and physicians were assessed by GPs from different European countries [15].…”