2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are there subtypes of alexithymia?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
3
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
45
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, higher emotional cognitive capacities result in higher baseline GSR levels. These suggestive results seem to contradict the results of a very recent study (Bagby et al, 2009) indicating that high alexithymics (subjects scoring in the top 20% on the TAS-20) have higher GSR baseline levels. However, it should be noted that our baseline levels refer to the second preceding the stimulus onset.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, higher emotional cognitive capacities result in higher baseline GSR levels. These suggestive results seem to contradict the results of a very recent study (Bagby et al, 2009) indicating that high alexithymics (subjects scoring in the top 20% on the TAS-20) have higher GSR baseline levels. However, it should be noted that our baseline levels refer to the second preceding the stimulus onset.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Parker et al (1993), in Connelly and Denny (2007) published TAS cut-off scores for non-alexithymia (≤52), borderline (52-60), and alexithymia (N60). Since then many authors in alexithymia research work with extreme groups, ignoring subjects scoring in the borderline or middle range (for instance: Roedema and Simons, 1999;Stone and Nielson, 2001;Gündel et al, 2004, andConnelly andDenny, 2007;Bagby et al, 2009). Since the BVAQ provides scores on two dimensions, we complied to this approach by creating four extreme groups: (1) low capacities on both dimensions (AFF−, COG−; N = 15); (2) low on the cognitive dimension and high on the affective dimension (AFF+, COG−; N = 20); (3) high cognitive and low on the affective (AFF−, COG+; N = 16); and (4) high on both dimensions (AFF+, COG+; N = 15) (For reasons of convenience we applied a reversed scoring, thus a plus (+) indicates that the capacities are high, whereas a minus (−) corresponds to low capacities (alexithymia is related to low capacities)).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The validity of this two-factor structure has been confirmed through factor analyses (Bailey & Henry, 2007;Bekker, Bachrach, & Croon, 2007;Bermond et al, 2007; but see Bagby et al, 2009 for failure to support the two-factor structure). The correlation between the cognitive BVAQ factor and the total score of the TAS-20 is high (r = 0.80), indicating that they assess the same alexithymic features (Vorst & Bermond, 2001).…”
Section: Alexithymia and Empathy Scalesmentioning
confidence: 97%