2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are UK radiologists satisfied with the training and support received in suspected child abuse?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be due to fewer children within these categories attending emergency departments to provide the necessary imaging data for training AI models, but the result is that specific paediatric populations may be unintentionally marginalised or poorly served by such new technologies and raises potential ethical considerations about their future usage particularly when performance characteristics are extrapolated beyond the population on which the tool was developed and validated [ 53 ]. An example would be an AI tool which could help to evaluate the particular aspects of fractures relating to suspected physical abuse as an adjunct to clinical practice given that many practising paediatric radiologists do not feel appropriately trained or confident in this aspect of imaging assessment [ 54 57 ]. Whilst data are limited, one study did address the topic of using AI for identifying suspected physical abuse through the detection of corner metaphyseal fractures (a specific marker of abuse) [ 58 ] with a high diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to fewer children within these categories attending emergency departments to provide the necessary imaging data for training AI models, but the result is that specific paediatric populations may be unintentionally marginalised or poorly served by such new technologies and raises potential ethical considerations about their future usage particularly when performance characteristics are extrapolated beyond the population on which the tool was developed and validated [ 53 ]. An example would be an AI tool which could help to evaluate the particular aspects of fractures relating to suspected physical abuse as an adjunct to clinical practice given that many practising paediatric radiologists do not feel appropriately trained or confident in this aspect of imaging assessment [ 54 57 ]. Whilst data are limited, one study did address the topic of using AI for identifying suspected physical abuse through the detection of corner metaphyseal fractures (a specific marker of abuse) [ 58 ] with a high diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has previously been shown that the diagnostic accuracy of relatively senior radiologists for the detection of the subtle fractures of child abuse was low and that there was no correlation between years of experience and expertise, in spite of many experts being experienced (19). A further study demonstrated that UK radiologists perceive they would benefit from improved training in this field (20).…”
Section: B J R U N C O R R E C T E D P R O O F Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with the best quality imaging, acquired by experienced radiographers in a compliant child, subtle findings may be missed and / or others mis-interpreted. Training in this area remains a key priority and is recognised as such [7]. The time interval between the first and second parts of the skeletal survey gives an opportunity to evaluate the child further, and identify radiological changes over time, although potentially delaying the diagnosis [8], and other imaging modalities such as chest CT may need to be considered in the first instance.…”
Section: Imaging In Spamentioning
confidence: 99%