2016
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5710-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are We Allowed to Limit Surgical Aggressiveness With Small Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgical resection is the principle treatment for GISTs [7] , but larger tumors are more difficult to resect completely and have a higher risk of local recurrence because of intraoperative capsule damage. Treating rectal GISTs is particularly difficult because of the anatomical constraints of the pelvis, which hinder manipulation and preserve anal function [8] , [9] . In particular, there have been no reports on GISTs wherein anal function was preserved because of suspected external anal sphincter invasion, as in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical resection is the principle treatment for GISTs [7] , but larger tumors are more difficult to resect completely and have a higher risk of local recurrence because of intraoperative capsule damage. Treating rectal GISTs is particularly difficult because of the anatomical constraints of the pelvis, which hinder manipulation and preserve anal function [8] , [9] . In particular, there have been no reports on GISTs wherein anal function was preserved because of suspected external anal sphincter invasion, as in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an interesting subgroup of the GISTs, because of their large size and the proximity to the anal sphincter. Due to their location, abdominoperineal resection, with possible complications such as sexual or urological dysfunctions,14 is sometimes unavoidable. Therefore, neoadjuvant treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be necessary in order to achieve local complete resection with anus preservation, as in the case we present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim is to do the lesion excision (R0 resection), without violating the lesion itself. In the low rectum, there must be taken account the proximity of the anal sphincters, with risks of complications like anal incontinence or sexual or urological dysfunction in more extensive resections [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%