2016
DOI: 10.1044/cicsd_43_s_77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are We Asking the Right Questions About Pedagogy in Communication Sciences and Disorders?

Abstract: Just as clinicians employ evidence-based practice, educational programs should be based on evidence showing their efficacy. Asking questions about the best approaches is a precursor to advancing pedagogy. Method: Evidence from studies of education and learning are reviewed to address the following questions: Do instructors and students have different purposes for education? Does the purpose affect the development of learning skills? Are students asking the right questions about their learning? How can we maxim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the CSD clinical context, a student-clinician might be able to make simple adjustments to the strategies for a child who already reads fluently, but could be more perplexed about what strategies to use when working with a child who pulls off a cochlear implant during a shared-reading session. Difficulty may increase further with the cognitive load of complex problems or the intensity of dueling concepts, such as perception of a child's needs vs. the desire to follow a prescribed clinical protocol that does not seem to fit those needs (Berlyne, 1965;Firestone, 2004;Folkins, 2016;Harmon-Jones, Harmon-Jones, & Levy, 2015;Hirsh, Galinsky, & Zhong, 2011;Jonassen, 2012;McFall, 2015;McNamee & Celona, 2008;Tolsgaard, Kulasegaram, & Ringsted, 2016;Walton, 2011). Even for difficult choices, justification may follow as this often provides a sense of self-protection (Lee & Schwarz, 2010;Stone, & Focella, 2011;Wong, 2009).…”
Section: Critical Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, in the CSD clinical context, a student-clinician might be able to make simple adjustments to the strategies for a child who already reads fluently, but could be more perplexed about what strategies to use when working with a child who pulls off a cochlear implant during a shared-reading session. Difficulty may increase further with the cognitive load of complex problems or the intensity of dueling concepts, such as perception of a child's needs vs. the desire to follow a prescribed clinical protocol that does not seem to fit those needs (Berlyne, 1965;Firestone, 2004;Folkins, 2016;Harmon-Jones, Harmon-Jones, & Levy, 2015;Hirsh, Galinsky, & Zhong, 2011;Jonassen, 2012;McFall, 2015;McNamee & Celona, 2008;Tolsgaard, Kulasegaram, & Ringsted, 2016;Walton, 2011). Even for difficult choices, justification may follow as this often provides a sense of self-protection (Lee & Schwarz, 2010;Stone, & Focella, 2011;Wong, 2009).…”
Section: Critical Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the unsettling quality of cognitive dissonance, it frequently benefits student-clinicians because it activates critical reflection, which then produces changes in beliefs and improves future clinical-teaching practices (Barron, 2015;Folkins, 2016;Gay, 2010). The dissonance tends to engage skepticism, curiosity, questioning of ideas and alternative views, prompting students to search for information to better understand a situation-all of which characterize critical thinking (Atabaki, Keshtiaray, & Yarmohammadian, 2015;Lai, 2011;Patrick, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This highlights the importance for educators to expand reflection of their pedagogy practice to include the evaluation of student learning and long-term retention as described in the scholarship of teaching and learning in SLP (Dalton, Klein, & Botts, 2017). Initiatives have begun to revise pedagogy practice in communication science disorders from a theory first to a practice first model (Brackenbury, Folkins, & Ginsberg, 2014;Folkins, 2016). Several curriculum redesigns integrating theory and practice have been reported including problem-based learning, simulation models, and horizontal and vertical integration (Dudding & Nottingham, 2017;Strobel & van Barneveld, 2009;Vinney & Harvey, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%