2019
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2019.1655396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are we just engaging ‘the usual suspects’? Challenges in and practical strategies for supporting equity and diversity in student–staff partnership initiatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our findings align with calls for considered strategies when designing for SaP in relation to equity (Bovill et al, 2016;Mercer-Mapstone & Bovill, 2020;Mercer-Mapstone et al, 2021). Our approach to centering equity with considerations of entanglement with power and intersectionality manifested from the recruitment stage of student partnerships, and remained centered throughout the program.…”
Section: Concluding Reflections and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…First, our findings align with calls for considered strategies when designing for SaP in relation to equity (Bovill et al, 2016;Mercer-Mapstone & Bovill, 2020;Mercer-Mapstone et al, 2021). Our approach to centering equity with considerations of entanglement with power and intersectionality manifested from the recruitment stage of student partnerships, and remained centered throughout the program.…”
Section: Concluding Reflections and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This has meant the faculty can employ SEC who are representative of our student body, with sufficient SEC diversity to aid inclusive curricular design. This approach is in contrast to current research that institutional level SaP projects, although often large-scale and involving multiple projects, can sometimes be modest in the number of students involved and not represent the student body (Mercer-Mapstone & Bovill, 2020;Mercer-Mapstone et al, 2021). It should be noted that the gender ratio of SEC does not fully reflect the student body, even with the recent increase to an equal split between male and female students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Such conceptions critique structures within HE-including those structures which seek to engage students. This includes, for example, considering to what extent student representatives and institutional engagement structures and schemes are reflective of or accessible to a diversity of students (Bols, 2017;Matthews, 2017;Healey & Healey, 2019;Mercer-Mapstone et al, 2021). Much of this previous research problematises these structures, indicating that, especially at institutional level, engagement mechanisms often accommodate the elite-those students who have the time, capital and financial stability to engage with mostly unpaid extracurricular opportunities to make their voices heard (Mercer-Mapstone et al, 2021).…”
Section: Deconstructing Homogeneity In Student Voice and Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%