2014 Third International Workshop on Building Analysis Datasets and Gathering Experience Returns for Security (BADGERS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/badgers.2014.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are We Missing Labels? A Study of the Availability of Ground-Truth in Network Security Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This absence is commonly discussed in related work [26,19,23]. In earlier work [2] we have shown by empirical analysis that this hypothesis in fact holds true. Hence, for the remainder of this position paper we accept this hypothesis and discuss these challenges under the assumption of general unavailability of labelled real-world data.…”
Section: Challenges In Cyber-securitymentioning
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This absence is commonly discussed in related work [26,19,23]. In earlier work [2] we have shown by empirical analysis that this hypothesis in fact holds true. Hence, for the remainder of this position paper we accept this hypothesis and discuss these challenges under the assumption of general unavailability of labelled real-world data.…”
Section: Challenges In Cyber-securitymentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This is rather astonishing, as on the other hand we recognise a manifested belief in our community to doubt the relevance and utility of synthetic data. We back this observation by our empirical analysis of data sets used in network security research [2]. This analysis shows that indeed only 9% of the publications we analysed performed experiments utilising synthetic data.…”
Section: Limitations Of Synthetic Datamentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations