2022
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1016988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are we ready for the revision of the 14-day rule? Implications from Chinese legislations guiding human embryo and embryoid research

Abstract: The ISSCR recently released new guidelines that relaxed the 14-day rule taking away the tough barrier, and this has rekindled relevant ethical controversies and posed a fresh set of challenges to each nation’s legislations and policies directly or indirectly. To understand its broad implications and the variation and impact of China’s relevant national policies, we reviewed and evaluated Chinese laws, administrative regulations, departmental rules, and normative documents on fundamental and preclinical researc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most pressing question regarding SCEM is whether they should be exempt from the so called "14-day rule" which limits in-vitro embryo development beyond this point. The 14-day rule was first proposed by The Ethics Advisory Board of the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare in 1979, and then endorsed in the UK by the influential Warnock Report [20].…”
Section: Scem and The 14-day Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most pressing question regarding SCEM is whether they should be exempt from the so called "14-day rule" which limits in-vitro embryo development beyond this point. The 14-day rule was first proposed by The Ethics Advisory Board of the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare in 1979, and then endorsed in the UK by the influential Warnock Report [20].…”
Section: Scem and The 14-day Rulementioning
confidence: 99%