2017
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are We There Yet? Human Factors Knowledge and Health Information Technology – the Challenges of Implementation and Impact

Abstract: SummaryObjective: To review the developments in human factors (HF) research on the challenges of health information technology (HIT) implementation and impact given the continuing incidence of usability problems and unintended consequences from HIT development and use. Methods: A search of PubMed/Medline and Web of Science® identified HF research published in 2015 and 2016. Electronic health records (EHRs) and patient-centred HIT emerged as significant foci of recent HF research. The authors selected prominent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ammenwerth (2019) emphasises that the formation of knowledge in HIs among scholars could propel how efficient and effective they were in provision of quality services to human being in general. Evidence-based research by Park (2016) and Turner, Kushniruk and Nohr (2017), and Ammenwerth ( 2019) indicate that HIs serves as interference for healthcare and in bio-medical domains where health professionals and scholars progressively advance their practices for improved patient care through a number of digital information systems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ammenwerth (2019) emphasises that the formation of knowledge in HIs among scholars could propel how efficient and effective they were in provision of quality services to human being in general. Evidence-based research by Park (2016) and Turner, Kushniruk and Nohr (2017), and Ammenwerth ( 2019) indicate that HIs serves as interference for healthcare and in bio-medical domains where health professionals and scholars progressively advance their practices for improved patient care through a number of digital information systems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These technological tools are used by physicians and other scholars to harvest the data and information required for further collection, analysis and exchange, for the purpose of delivering quality services. Technology has made life much easier for health professionals and scholars, such that, they no longer struggle to interpret data and information collected to enhance their service delivery (Park, 2016;Turner, Kushniruk and Nohr, 2017;Ammenwerth, 2019). To this end, medical practitioners and other scholars in related fields could apply their experiences and knowledge to answer difficulties in health issues.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint International Classification of Diseases and ICF implementation in every day clinical practice could allow standardizing the information reported in digital health records and providing a benchmark by which research and clinical data could be compared internationally. Nowadays data comparison is considered mandatory worldwide and big data analysis require a shared standard, often a challenge more than a reached objective, where digital transformation is unfortunately not as straightforward as needed [100]. Usability problems are tackled every day and a lean perspective should always guide the digital transformation [101], where the centrality should always be provided to contents more than tools and to patient's clinical management.…”
Section: The International Classification Of Functioning Disability mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technology user interface must be intuitive and tailored to the specific user group, and when needed, the right effort must be organized to equip users to apply the technology properly. Human factors are an important part of health technology [37].…”
Section: Usability In Health Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%