2017
DOI: 10.4103/2212-5531.201900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are WHO approved nucleic acid amplification tests causing large-scale “false identification” of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis?: Programmatic experience from south india

Abstract: The probable reasons for the mismatch are "sub-breakpoint low-level resistance mutants," hetero-resistant bacterial populations, and other inherent test limitations along with the low RR TB prevalence in South India (<5%) among "presumptive multidrug-resistants." This could be due to the incomplete selection pressure by an inadequate RIF exposure caused by various factors including a low-RIF dosage being used widely and poor Directly observed treatment. To prevent the false diagnosis of RR TB in a massive scal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are concerns both about false-negative and false-positive Xpert MTB/RIF test results, and a policy of confirmatory testing has been introduced in South Africa and Brazil 28,29 . The discordant DST results that potentially led to under treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (false negative for resistance) were mainly based on locally performed cultures, Xpert MTB/RIF tests, or a combination of the two.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are concerns both about false-negative and false-positive Xpert MTB/RIF test results, and a policy of confirmatory testing has been introduced in South Africa and Brazil 28,29 . The discordant DST results that potentially led to under treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (false negative for resistance) were mainly based on locally performed cultures, Xpert MTB/RIF tests, or a combination of the two.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are concerns both about false-negative and false-positive Xpert MTB/RIF test results, and a policy of confirmatory testing has been introduced in South Africa and Brazil [27,28]. The discordant DST results that potentially led to under treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (false negative for resistance) were mainly based on locally performed cultures, Xpert MTB/RIF tests, or a combination of the two.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can also be used to assess disease intensity levels, as well as for diagnosing complications related with tuberculosis. [15][16][17][18] Whole genome sequencing (WGS), loop mediated isothermal amplification, breath tests for volatile organic compounds and urine assay for lipoarabinomannan are all new methods that can increase the accuracy of TB diagnosis; also improve its accessibility. These cuttingedge technologies also have the potential of point-of-care testing, increased sensitivity in certain groups (children or immunocompromised patients), and even direct drug resistance patterns observed from clinical specimens.…”
Section: Tuberculosis Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%