2016
DOI: 10.1177/1474704915623698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Women’s Mate Preferences for Altruism Also Influenced by Physical Attractiveness?

Abstract: Altruism plays a role in mate choice, particularly in women’s preferences and in long-term (LT) relationships. The current study analyzed how these preferences interacted with another important mate choice variable, physical attractiveness. Here, female participants were presented with photographs of men of varying levels of physical attractiveness, alongside descriptions of them behaving either altruistically or not in different scenarios. The results showed women preferred altruistic men, particularly in LT … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

10
86
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, both characteristics were preferred more so in long-term partners, which is commensurate with the findings of existing research pointing at the particular value of prosociality in long-term relationships (Barclay, 2010;Farrelly, 2011Farrelly, , 2013Farrelly et al, 2016;Oda et al, 2014;Stavrova & Ehlebracht, 2015), suggesting that prosociality acts predominantly as a signal of good partner/parenting quality to potential mates. Furthermore, both characteristics were preferred more so in long-term partners, which is commensurate with the findings of existing research pointing at the particular value of prosociality in long-term relationships (Barclay, 2010;Farrelly, 2011Farrelly, , 2013Farrelly et al, 2016;Oda et al, 2014;Stavrova & Ehlebracht, 2015), suggesting that prosociality acts predominantly as a signal of good partner/parenting quality to potential mates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, both characteristics were preferred more so in long-term partners, which is commensurate with the findings of existing research pointing at the particular value of prosociality in long-term relationships (Barclay, 2010;Farrelly, 2011Farrelly, , 2013Farrelly et al, 2016;Oda et al, 2014;Stavrova & Ehlebracht, 2015), suggesting that prosociality acts predominantly as a signal of good partner/parenting quality to potential mates. Furthermore, both characteristics were preferred more so in long-term partners, which is commensurate with the findings of existing research pointing at the particular value of prosociality in long-term relationships (Barclay, 2010;Farrelly, 2011Farrelly, , 2013Farrelly et al, 2016;Oda et al, 2014;Stavrova & Ehlebracht, 2015), suggesting that prosociality acts predominantly as a signal of good partner/parenting quality to potential mates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Hence, both women and men generally exhibit pronounced preferences for physically attractive partners (Buss, 1989b;Li, Bailey, Kenrick, & Linsenmeier, 2002). In other words, if prosociality is a signal of good partner/parenting quality as has been suggested previously (Farrelly, 2011(Farrelly, , 2013Farrelly et al, 2016;Oda et al, 2014), then its desirability across mating contexts will follow a different pattern to the desirability of a signal of good genetic quality such as physical attractiveness. Therefore, the pattern of its desirability when combined with prosociality across different mating contexts will provide valuable evidence as to whether the latter is predominantly a signal of good genes or good partner/parenting quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations