2021
DOI: 10.3390/e24010006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Words the Quanta of Human Language? Extending the Domain of Quantum Cognition

Abstract: In previous research, we showed that ‘texts that tell a story’ exhibit a statistical structure that is not Maxwell–Boltzmann but Bose–Einstein. Our explanation is that this is due to the presence of ‘indistinguishability’ in human language as a result of the same words in different parts of the story being indistinguishable from one another, in much the same way that ’indistinguishability’ occurs in quantum mechanics, also there leading to the presence of Bose–Einstein rather than Maxwell–Boltzmann as a statis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, then, we can speak of a “decrease in entropy” and hence an “increase in order” for the entire text, as a consequence of entanglement, relative to the order grasped by individual words. These findings made us think further, and we now believe that it is possible to understand and explain the process we identified in Aerts and Beltran ( 2022 ), from a fundamental analysis about what concepts represent in relation to human experience. Since this new insight about entanglement can also contribute, as we will explain, to a better understanding of what the “meaning dynamics” represents that we introduced and studied in this Section 4, we bring here, as the concluding part of this Section 4, a description of this insight about entanglement.…”
Section: A Dynamics Of Meaningmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this sense, then, we can speak of a “decrease in entropy” and hence an “increase in order” for the entire text, as a consequence of entanglement, relative to the order grasped by individual words. These findings made us think further, and we now believe that it is possible to understand and explain the process we identified in Aerts and Beltran ( 2022 ), from a fundamental analysis about what concepts represent in relation to human experience. Since this new insight about entanglement can also contribute, as we will explain, to a better understanding of what the “meaning dynamics” represents that we introduced and studied in this Section 4, we bring here, as the concluding part of this Section 4, a description of this insight about entanglement.…”
Section: A Dynamics Of Meaningmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We want to end this Section 4 by using a result that we elaborated in a recent publication related to the presence of entanglement in the combination of words in a text because it also sheds light on our analysis of “meaning dynamics” in this Section 4 and the difference between bosons and fermions and language and memory (Aerts and Beltran, 2022 ). We have identified entanglement in human cognition and language and studied various aspects of it in our Brussels research group over the years (Aerts and Sozzo, 2011 , 2014 ; Aerts Arguëlles, 2018 ; Aerts et al, 2018a , b , 2019a , 2021 ).…”
Section: A Dynamics Of Meaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations