1997
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.154.5.674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Are you depressed?" Screening for depression in the terminally ill

Abstract: Objective: This study compared the performance of four brief screening measures for depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 419 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The respective tool has to be suitable not only for differentiation between depression and "quite normal" psychological distress of patients coping with cancer diagnosis but also for avoiding misattribution of symptoms of the tumor disease to depression [20]. Unfortunately studies on the predictive value of the different screening tools are sparse [29,30]. The basic structures of the established depression assessment tools are mainly diagnostic interviews, patient self-report forms or observer ratings [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The respective tool has to be suitable not only for differentiation between depression and "quite normal" psychological distress of patients coping with cancer diagnosis but also for avoiding misattribution of symptoms of the tumor disease to depression [20]. Unfortunately studies on the predictive value of the different screening tools are sparse [29,30]. The basic structures of the established depression assessment tools are mainly diagnostic interviews, patient self-report forms or observer ratings [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of structured clinical interviews is undoubted, but they have to be conducted by skilled staff and therefore require enormous amounts of resources [31]. Patient self-report screening inventories are brief enough and therefore more useful in routine application in cancer patients [30]. Furthermore, self-report forms are supposed to be more sensitive to identify significant functional impairment during follow up [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a busy oncology practice where time is limited, a single question: “Do you often feel sad and depressed?” may be an adequate screen. 82,83 Others have reported, however, that this simplified method may miss a significant proportion of patients who are depressed. 84 …”
Section: Psychological Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion criteria included reporting to have been diagnosed by a psychiatrist or a psychologist with major mental disorders including major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder or PTSD. Similar single-item screening is a quick means to screen for mental disorders and has been proven to be valid (e.g., Chochinov et al, 1997; Farvolden et al, 2003; Donker et al, 2009). In addition, exclusion criteria included scoring higher than 30 on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (Weathers et al, 2013), as sum scores of 31 or higher indicate probable PTSD (cf.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%