2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61204-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are You Lying: Validating the Time-Location of Outdoor Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simon et al [48] utilized video cameras and microphones to infer PINs entered on a number-only soft keyboard on a smartphone. Li et al [33] can verify the capture time and location of the photos with the sun position estimated based on the shadows in the photo and sensor readings of the cameras. Sun et al [55] presented a video-assisted keystroke inference framework to infer a tablet user's inputs from surreptitious video recordings of the tablet motion.…”
Section: Software-based Defensementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simon et al [48] utilized video cameras and microphones to infer PINs entered on a number-only soft keyboard on a smartphone. Li et al [33] can verify the capture time and location of the photos with the sun position estimated based on the shadows in the photo and sensor readings of the cameras. Sun et al [55] presented a video-assisted keystroke inference framework to infer a tablet user's inputs from surreptitious video recordings of the tablet motion.…”
Section: Software-based Defensementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system was tested for person verification, location verification, and painter verification of artworks. However, the system is more closely related to approaches for metadata verification [7,8,23,26] as it only verifies the consistency between pairs of images and metadata and does not incorporate any textual information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering timestamp manipulation, Kakar et al [15] and Li et al [19] propose to verify the timestamp by estimating the sun azimuth angle from shadow angles and sky appearance, comparing it to the sun position calculated from the image metadata. Chen et al [3] optimize a CNN to jointly estimate temperature, humidity, sun altitude angle and weather condition from an input image, comparing them with meteorological data registered from the day and time stored in its metadata.…”
Section: Metadata Tampering Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, factors such as the weather, lighting conditions, device quality, and depicted elements influence the appearance of a recorded scene and directly affect our perception of time. Existing methods often estimate indirect features from the image content, such as the sun position in the sky [3,15,19] or meteorological measures [3], and contrast them to registered values for the same day, hour and location. However, these are limited cues which may not always be sufficient nor easily available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%