Are YouTube Videos Useful for Patients Interested in Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism?

Gaş, Selin; Zincir, Özge Özdal; Bozkurt, Aylin Paşaoğlu

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.004

Cited by 91 publications

(105 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Negative prediction of reliability arising from dislikes are excluded from the scope of VPI index. 11,15 The relationship of video source and video content was found to be unrelated to VPI averages in this study (P > 0.05). Thus, we can state there is poor relationship of VPI in evaluation of AIDR videos based on video source and content.…”

Section: Ta B L Ementioning

confidence: 51%

“…The VPI outcomes of this study are in agreement with several previous studies that evaluated the popularity of YouTube videos. 11,12,17 In this AIDR-specific study, the DISCERN score was 15.98 (score 0 to 25), the mean JAMAS was 3.75 (score 0 to 4), the mGQS was 3.47 (score 0 to 5), and the TCE was 2.89 (score 0 to 6). The results suggest that the reliability of the information on AIDR obtained from YouTube is good/ moderate and quality results provided good/moderate information regarding the types of scorings, respectively.…”

Section: Ta B L Ementioning

confidence: 68%

“…Our deduction agrees with the results of previous analyses on academic source videos on YouTube, revealing high reliability and quality. 11,18 JAMAS and mGQS are validated quality assessment tools that are preferred for being reproducible. 19 The impact of this article is based mainly on using multiple scoring scales for assessing reliability (DISCERN) and quality (JAMAS, GQS, and TCE).…”

Section: Ta B L Ementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Quality of information on YouTube about artificial intelligence in dental radiology

Aydın

Güneç

2020

Journal of Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This study was designed to investigate Artificial Intelligence in Dental Radiology (AIDR) videos on YouTube in terms of popularity, content, reliability, and educational quality. Methods: Two researchers systematically searched about AIDR on YouTube on January 27, 2020, by using the terms "artificial intelligence in dental radiology," "machine learning in dental radiology," and "deep learning in dental radiology." The search was performed in English, and 60 videos for each keyword were assessed. Video source, content type, time since upload, duration, and number of views, likes, and dislikes were recorded. Video popularity was reported using Video Power Index (VPI). The accuracy and reliability of the source of information were measured using the adapted DISCERN score. The quality of the videos was measured using JAMAS and modified Global Quality Score (mGQS) and content via Total Concent Evaluation (TCE). Results: There was high interobserver agreement for DISCERN (intraclass cor

show abstract

Section: Ta B L Ementioning

confidence: 51%

Section: Ta B L Ementioning

confidence: 68%

Section: Ta B L Ementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quality of information on YouTube about artificial intelligence in dental radiology

Aydın

Güneç

2020

Journal of Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Obviously, the importance and educational value of YouTube TM videos have been underestimated. Several studies have assessed health-related videos on YouTube TM such as oral leukoplakia, Diabetic Foot Care, Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism [11][12][13]. However, given the uncontrollable nature of information sources, there are significant risks associated with poor, incomplete and incorrect health information dissemination [14,15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

YouTubeTM as a source of information for Candida auris infection: A systematic review

Huang

Zhang

Xiao

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background : Candida auris is a novel Candida species, and has emerged globally as a multidrug-resistant health care-associated fungal pathogen. YouTube TM (http://www.youtube.com) as the largest free video-sharing website is increasingly used to search health information. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the content, reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos regarding Candida auris infection, and to identify whether it is a useful resource for people. Methods : The YouTube™ was used to search systematically for videos using the keywords: “ Candida auris infection” and “ Candida auris ”. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select the videos. The videos were reviewed and scored by two independent reviewers and recorded the “title”, “length”, “views”, “comments”, “dislike”, “like”, “posted days” and “category of videos”. The videos were categorized as “poor”, “good” and “excellent” by the score. The DISCERN tool was used to assess the reliability of the YouTube TM videos. Results : Seventy-six videos were included in final analysis in our study. Most videos (59.2%, 55/76) had better quality. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in respect of the number of likes, dislikes, views, comments, percentage positivity, likebility, view rate and viewers' interaction. Length and posted days were significantly associated with the classification. The videos were categorized as “educational video”, “new report”, “personal experience and blog entertainment” and “interview”. Significant differences were found in the source of videos and the characteristics of the individuals appearing in a video between the groups. Conclusion : YouTube TM has striking potential to be an effective user-friendly learning interface for people to obtain information of Candida auris infection.

show abstract

“…Obviously, the importance and educational value of YouTube™ videos have been underestimated. Several studies have assessed health-related videos on YouTube™ such as oral leukoplakia, Diabetic Foot Care, Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism [11][12][13]. However, given the uncontrollable nature of information sources, there are significant risks associated with poor, incomplete and incorrect health information dissemination [14,15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

YouTubeTM as a source of information for Candida auris infection: A systematic review

Huang

Zhang

Xiao

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Candida auris is a novel Candida species, and has emerged globally as a multidrug-resistant health care-associated fungal pathogen. YouTubeTM (http://www.youtube.com) as the largest free video-sharing website is increasingly used to search health information. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the content, reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos regarding Candida auris infection, and to identify whether it is a useful resource for people. Methods: The YouTube™ was used to search systematically for videos using the keywords: “Candida auris infection” and “Candida auris”. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select the videos. The videos were reviewed and scored by two independent reviewers and recorded the “title”, “length”, “views”, “comments”, “dislike”, “like”, “posted days” and “category of videos”. The videos were categorized as “poor”, “good” and “excellent” by the score. The DISCERN tool was used to assess the reliability of the YouTubeTM videos. Results: Seventy-six videos were included in final analysis in our study. Most videos (59.2%, 55/76) had better quality. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in respect of the number of likes, dislikes, views, comments, percentage positivity, likebility, view rate and viewers' interaction. Length and posted days were significantly associated with the classification. The videos were categorized as “education”, “new report”, “personal experience and blog entertainment” and “interview”. Significant differences were found in the source of videos and the characteristics of the individuals appearing in a video between the groups. Conclusion: YouTubeTM has striking potential to be an effective user-friendly learning interface for people education and understanding of Candida auris infection.

show abstract

Are YouTube Videos Useful for Patients Interested in Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism?

Cited by 91 publications

References 29 publications

Quality of information on YouTube about artificial intelligence in dental radiology

Quality of information on YouTube about artificial intelligence in dental radiology

YouTubeTM as a source of information for Candida auris infection: A systematic review

YouTubeTM as a source of information for Candida auris infection: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About