1990
DOI: 10.1017/s0004972700018311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Area and length maxima for univalent functions

Abstract: Let S be the family of functions f(z) -z + ajz* + ... which are analytic and univalent in \z\ < 1. We find the valueas a function of r , 0 < r < 1. The known lower estimate of / " ? / _ l /<(z) l |dz| is improved. Relations with the growth theorem are considered and the radius of univalence of f(z)/z is discussed.For g analytic in D -{\z\ < 1}, we setWe call g Dirichlet-finite if A(l,g) < cx>. Let S be the family of functions for 0 < r < 1. For each r, 0 < r < 1, the maximum is attained only by the rotations o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We call f a Dirichlet-finite function if ∆(1, f ), the area covered by the mapping z → f (z) for |z| < 1, is finite. Our interest in this paper was originated by the work of Yamashita [21] and Ponnusamy et. al.…”
Section: Introduction Preliminaries and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We call f a Dirichlet-finite function if ∆(1, f ), the area covered by the mapping z → f (z) for |z| < 1, is finite. Our interest in this paper was originated by the work of Yamashita [21] and Ponnusamy et. al.…”
Section: Introduction Preliminaries and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a function has finite Dirichlet integral exactly when its image has finite area (counting multiplicities). In 1990, Yamashita proved the following. Theorem We have for the Yamashita functional, (1)0truemaxfscriptSnormalΔ()r,f(z)z=2πr2(r2+2)(1r2)44.ptfor4.pt0<r1. (2)0truemaxfscriptSnormalΔ()r,zf(z)=2πr2(r2+2)4.ptfor4.pt0<r1. For each r , 0<r1, the maximum is attained only by the rotations of the Koebe function k(z).…”
Section: Yamashita's Area Integralmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the family CS of convex functions, Yamashita [, p. 439] conjectured that trueprefixmaxfCΔr,zffalse(zfalse)=πr2,for0<r1,where the maximum is attained only by the rotations of the function j(z)=z/(1z). In , the authors proved this conjecture in a more general form and in , , the authors obtained analog result for some other classes of functions and spirallike functions, respectively.…”
Section: Yamashita's Area Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that k θ maps the unit disk D onto the complement of a ray. In any case, since the functional A f → L r ( f ) is continuous and the class S is compact, a solution of the extremal problem max f ∈S L r ( f ) (1.1) exists and is in S. We remark that with a clever use of Dirichlet-finite integral and the isoperimetric inequality, Yamashita [16] obtained the upper and lower estimates for the functional (1.1)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In any case, since the functional AfLr(f) is continuous and the class scriptS is compact, a solution of the extremal problem trueprefixmaxfSLr(f)exists and is in scriptS. We remark that with a clever use of Dirichlet‐finite integral and the isoperimetric inequality, Yamashita obtained the upper and lower estimates for the functional m(r)Lr(k)trueprefixmaxfSLr(f)2πr(1r)2,where m(r)=2πrr4+4r2+1(1r2)22πr(1+r)(1r)268>πr(1+r)2(1r)2.This observation provides an improvement over the earlier result of Duren [, Theorem 2] and [, p. 39], and moreover, m(r)62πr(1r)2.The extremal problem stimulated much research in the theory of univalent functions, and the problem of determining of the maximum value and the extremal functions in scriptS remains open. However, the extremal problem …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%