2009
DOI: 10.1109/tcsii.2009.2020928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Area-efficient reed-solomon decoder design for optical communications

Abstract: A high-speed low-complexity Reed-Solomon (RS) decoder architecture based on the recursive degree computationless modified Euclidean (rDCME) algorithm is presented in this brief. The proposed architecture has very low hardware complexity compared with the conventional modified Euclidean and degree computationless modified Euclidean (DCME) architectures, since it can reduce the degree computation circuitry and replace the conventional systolic architecture that uses many processing elements (PEs) with a recursiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Excluding the control block, the proposed FME architecture consists of 4 FFMs, 2 FFAs, 60 registers, and 4 multiplexers. In Table 2, although the designs in [3], [4], and [6] have better TC than ours because of the use of pipelined multipliers, the proposed FME architecture has the lowest AC and the smallest AT complexity. Compared with design in [5], ours has small AC and TC, respectively, because fewer registers are required for storing the coefficients of updated polynomials and a shorter critical path delay exists in the proposed design.…”
Section: Complexity Analysis Of the Kes Unitmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Excluding the control block, the proposed FME architecture consists of 4 FFMs, 2 FFAs, 60 registers, and 4 multiplexers. In Table 2, although the designs in [3], [4], and [6] have better TC than ours because of the use of pipelined multipliers, the proposed FME architecture has the lowest AC and the smallest AT complexity. Compared with design in [5], ours has small AC and TC, respectively, because fewer registers are required for storing the coefficients of updated polynomials and a shorter critical path delay exists in the proposed design.…”
Section: Complexity Analysis Of the Kes Unitmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Compared with design in [5], ours has small AC and TC, respectively, because fewer registers are required for storing the coefficients of updated polynomials and a shorter critical path delay exists in the proposed design. The design in [6] takes 260 clock cycles for solving the key equation. This implies that the performance of the decoder is degraded because the decoding delay of the KES unit is more than 255.…”
Section: Complexity Analysis Of the Kes Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations