1974
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197410)34:4<1278::aid-cncr2820340440>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Areas of failure found at reoperation (second or symptomatic look) following “curative surgery” for adenocarcinoma of the rectum:Clinicopathologic correlation and implications for adjuvant therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
150
0
12

Year Published

1979
1979
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 710 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
150
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision is the standard for care when MRI staging demonstrates threatened surgical margins in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) [1,2]. Radiotherapy planning for rectal cancer uses conventional orthogonal simulation with standardised radiation fields based on patterns of loco-regional relapse in relation to pelvic bony anatomy [3]. Three-field conventional orthogonal planning is considered an acceptable technique for planning preoperative CRT and major trials evaluating long-course chemoradiation for rectal cancer have permitted the use of conventional planning within their protocols [4,5].…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision is the standard for care when MRI staging demonstrates threatened surgical margins in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) [1,2]. Radiotherapy planning for rectal cancer uses conventional orthogonal simulation with standardised radiation fields based on patterns of loco-regional relapse in relation to pelvic bony anatomy [3]. Three-field conventional orthogonal planning is considered an acceptable technique for planning preoperative CRT and major trials evaluating long-course chemoradiation for rectal cancer have permitted the use of conventional planning within their protocols [4,5].…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably, the true incidence of the surgical seeding is not well known, but it seems to be an uncommon event, with an overall incidence rate of 5% or less, that rarely results in identifiable metastases. [22][23][24][25][26][27] Concerning skull base tumour sites, Moore et al 23 reported an actuarial risk of incisional relapse of 3% at 1 year in a series of 70 patients treated for sinonasal malignancies with midface and anterior skull base surgery. The possible mechanism of surgical pathway recurrence may be a direct implantation of tumour cells at the time of the surgical procedure or also a haematogenous spread to this particular location in which the increased blood flow and concentration of unknown chemotactic factors may increase the likelihood of tumour cells implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hepatic and peritoneal metastases have been reported to be the most frequent failure patterns in resected colorectal cancer patients [26][27][28]. Local peritoneal recurrence and hematological toxicity were lower when 5-FU was administered intraperitoneally [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%