The ligands N,N′‐bis(1,3,4,5‐tetramethylimidazolin‐2‐ylidene)‐1,2‐ethanediamine (BLMe) and N,N′‐bis(1,3‐diisopropyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazolin‐2‐ylidene)‐1,2‐ethanediamine(BLiPr) react with [(η5‐C5Me5)RuCl]4 to afford cationic 16‐electron half‐sandwich complexes [(η5‐C5Me5)Ru(BLR)]+ (R = Me, 3; R = iPr, 4), which resist coordination of the chloride counterion because of the strong electron‐donating ability of the diimine ligands. Upon reaction with [(η6‐C6H6)RuCl2]2 or [(η6‐C10H14)RuCl2]2, these ligands stabilize dicationic 16‐electron benzene and cymene complexes of the type [(η6‐C6H6)Ru(BLR)]2+ (R = Me, 5; R = iPr, 6) and [(η6‐C10H14)Ru(BLR)]2+ (R = Me, 7; R = iPr, 8). The X‐ray crystal structure of [5]Cl2 reveals the absence of any direct Ru–Cl interaction, whereas a long Ru–Cl bond, supported by two CH···Cl hydrogen bonds, is observed for [(6)Cl]Cl in the solid state. Treatment of the dichlorides of 6 and 8 with NaBF4 affords [6](BF4)2 and [8](BF4)2, which are composed of individual dications and tetrafluoroborate ions with no direct Ru–F interaction. All complexes catalyze the transfer hydrogenation of acetophenone in boiling 2‐propanol. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2009)