1994
DOI: 10.1006/exer.1994.1038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ArF 193 nm Excimer Laser Corneal Surgery as a Possible Risk Factor in Cataractogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent reports suggest that photorefractive keratectomy induces a transient increase in the concentration of H 2 O 2 in the aqueous humor of treated rabbits (2,3), raising concern about the cataractogenic risk of an exposure to UV-laser or secondary radiation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reports suggest that photorefractive keratectomy induces a transient increase in the concentration of H 2 O 2 in the aqueous humor of treated rabbits (2,3), raising concern about the cataractogenic risk of an exposure to UV-laser or secondary radiation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not detect any changes to the crystalline lens or the central retina of the irradiated animals. The safety of excimer laser irradiation has also been demonstrated experimentally [7,9,10] and by the frequent clinical use in refractive laser surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Apart from ectasias and regression, cataract is an important cause for poor vision following refractive surgery. [23] A large number of these patients present with symptoms of glare and reduced contrast. A characteristic increase in higher order aberrations (HOAs) and scatter are seen, suggestive of what can be termed as “preclinical” lens changes, which can be detected using newer diagnostic modalities such as Scheimpflug imaging and ray tracing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[123] Patients' complaints include ghosting of images with increased glare and reduced contrast even before lenticular changes are clinically detectable. These symptoms, which are secondary to a subclinical cataract, can mimic post-LASIK regression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%