INTRODUCTIONNeuroethology has its historical origins in three scientifi c disciplines: com parative neuroanatomy, comparative and physiological psychology, and com parative ethology. Neuroethology, however, avoids the emphasis on structure characteristic of comparative neuroanatomy and on task-oriented problems popular with psychologists, while drawing heavily on behavioral adaptations, the hallmark of comparative ethological investigations. Neuroethological stud ies measure an animal's competence, not its capabilities, by testing the organ ism under naturalistic conditions rather than under artifi cial conditions that may give rise to misleading results . Although the boundaries of neuroethology are arbitrary, its focus is on complex behaviors and not on simple reflexes such as coughing and eye-wiping. Instead of determining how simple reflexes become organized, integrated, and synthesized to form the foundation of com plex behaviors (cf Te itelbaum et al 1983), neuroethological studies begin with the behavioral sequence itself, concentrating on motivated or goal-directed behaviors that have adaptive value .Behavior is best viewed as the fi nal common pathway in a dynamic process involving the organism's external and internal milieux. One can arbitrarily divide this complex interaction into four aspects: 457 o 147-006X/85/030 1 -0457$02.00Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1985.8:457-494. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org by Indiana University -Purdue University Indianapolis -IUPUI on 10/17/12. For personal use only. Quick links to online content Further ANNUAL REVIEWS 458 INGLE & CREWS 1. the way in which the organism has become sensitive to certain physical,biotic, and social factors as key stimuli; 2. the mechanisms by which these stimuli are presented and integrated within the brain; 3. how this representation of the environment results in changes in the organ ism's internal state; 4. how those physiological changes in the internal milieu influence the manner in which the organism interacts with its environment.Superimposed on these physiological issues is the ethologist's traditional con cern for development, ecological fitness, and evolutionary history. Because one's definition of "neuroethology" depends upon one's definition of ethology, it seems useful to begin this review by identifying the questions raised by ethologists concerning the mechanisms of behavior and discussing their methods for description and analysis of behavior. Certainly, ethologists focus their attention upon the behavior of animals in nature or within laboratory environments where natural behaviors easily emerge. Ethological studies are typically concerned with (a) natural stimuli that elicit biologically important behaviors such as feeding, fleeing, courtship, and fighting; (b) the spatiotem poral structure of ensuing action pattens (pursuit, biting, threatening, calling, etc), and (c) the motivational, developmental, and physiological conditionsthat determine which alternative response is likely to be elicited by a given sct of cxtcrnal stim...