2023
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/acbec6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Argon–seeded detachment during ELM control by RMPs in KSTAR

Abstract: In this study, we demonstrate argon-seeded discharges that exhibited a detached divertor during the full suppression and mitigation of edge localized modes (ELMs) by an ITER-like, three-row resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) configuration in KSTAR. During the ELM suppression phase, the peak heat flux on the divertor target was successfully reduced from 1.6 MW/m2 to 0.5 MW/m2 via argon seeding. Further, the ion saturation current densities corresponding to the particle fluxes on both targets were reduced by m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with increased radiation remains in the divertor volume itself, as shown in figure 6. This is an important difference compared to similar studies including the prior observations in KSTAR [16,18,19], in which a significant proportion of the additional radiation created by impurities comes from the confined core plasma [18].…”
Section: Compatibility Of Rmp-driven Elm-crash-suppression With Parti...mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with increased radiation remains in the divertor volume itself, as shown in figure 6. This is an important difference compared to similar studies including the prior observations in KSTAR [16,18,19], in which a significant proportion of the additional radiation created by impurities comes from the confined core plasma [18].…”
Section: Compatibility Of Rmp-driven Elm-crash-suppression With Parti...mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Unfortunately, when applied with RMP, such impurity/gas fueled plasmas often lead to a loss of ELM-crash-suppression with a small reduction of the divertor heat flux with respect to the otherwise similar ELM-crash-suppressed conditions (typically less than a factor of 2) as found in KSTAR [15], and EAST [16]. Larger reductions, while sustaining RMP-driven, ELM-crash suppression, have been obtained in DIII-D and KSTAR [18,19] but not through the increase of radiation in the divertor region but in the confined plasma. ITER is expected to operate with a partially detached high density divertor plasma so as to provide acceptable divertor power load handling [20], while maintaining a low core radiation to sustain the high confinement plasmas required for high fusion gain operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the potential candidates is the KSTAR divertor plasma detachment control based on the simplified real-time modeling [66], reducing the heat load on PFCs. However, the impurity seeding, the primary actuator of the detachment control, has a side effect on core plasma performance [67] and affects conditions to access ELM crash suppression by changing electron density and recycling conditions [68,69]. Therefore, incorporating the detachment control requires upgrading the integrated process to balance plasma detachment, ELM crash suppression, and plasma performance enhancement.…”
Section: Plans For Expanding the Integrated Process To Long-pulse Elm...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the heat flux width scales inversely with I [120], spreading the divertor power dissipation over a wider area at low I (assuming fixed separatrix density). These dependencies provide an explanation for the relative difficulty of AUG and DIII-D achieving edge-integrated RMP-ELM suppression, as compared to EAST and KSTAR [40,121,122], though the dynamics of the seeded impurities also play an essential role in divertor integration [123,124] as does the divertor geometry. Overall, additional effort is required to understand the n e,ped threshold, as its scaling to ITER and future devices is the key question confronting the possibility of integrating a dissipative divertor with the RMP scenario in high current scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%