2016
DOI: 10.21697/sp.2015.14.2.08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arguing the Need for Qualitative Exploration in the Field of Emerging Digital Pathologies

Abstract: Little has been done globally to ethnographically (and holistically) study and understand the lives of heavy Internet users, with insufficient qualitative research (that is, exploratory, descriptive, inductive) published throughout the world. This article presents the findings from qualitative semi-structured interviews with five psychologists, who were asked about their understanding of addiction and Problematic Internet Use. The findings demonstrate the complexity of the field and the possibility of co-morbi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many participants used the term 'addicted', when describing how young people interacted with technology, many appeared to reject the idea that the technology use itself was creating the problems young people were presenting to them with. This is aligned with other qualitative research suggesting psychologists find terms such as "Internet abuse" unhelpful in the case of those experiencing harms from heavy Internet use (Johnson, 2015). Instead, participants appeared to support a compensatory conceptualisation of technology-related problems (Kardefelt-Winther, 2014a).…”
Section: Perceptions Of How Problematic Technology Use Effects Mentalsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although many participants used the term 'addicted', when describing how young people interacted with technology, many appeared to reject the idea that the technology use itself was creating the problems young people were presenting to them with. This is aligned with other qualitative research suggesting psychologists find terms such as "Internet abuse" unhelpful in the case of those experiencing harms from heavy Internet use (Johnson, 2015). Instead, participants appeared to support a compensatory conceptualisation of technology-related problems (Kardefelt-Winther, 2014a).…”
Section: Perceptions Of How Problematic Technology Use Effects Mentalsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Ed-tech research has been criticised for its lack of theory, or for being vague in its use of theory (Bulfin et al, 2013(Bulfin et al, , 2014Costa et al, 2019;Hew et al, 2019;Johnson, 2015;McDougall et al, 2010). Additionally, just what does constitute 'theorising' in social research or in ed-tech research has been widely debated (Costa et al, 2019;Hammond, 2018;Hammond & Alotaibi, 2017;McDougall et al, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Review: Why Temporalities and Digital Technologies Within Schools? The Gap In The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, just what does constitute 'theorising' in social research or in ed-tech research has been widely debated (Costa et al, 2019;Hammond, 2018;Hammond & Alotaibi, 2017;McDougall et al, 2010). Furthermore, ed-tech research appears to privilege psychology-influenced theories such as cognitive load theory or self-determination theory (Hew et al, 2019;Johnson, 2015). While much of ed-tech research has focused on bringing about effective use of technology within teaching by teachers in order to enhance learning (for example, Saubern et al, 2020), few ed-tech studies have theorised the why of technology utilisation, in preference to focusing more on the how, taking a descriptive, utilitarian approach.…”
Section: Literature Review: Why Temporalities and Digital Technologies Within Schools? The Gap In The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…I have previously argued that more qualitative research should be conducted in this area surrounding internet addiction, over-use or problematic use (Johnson, 2015). The constant affirmation and attention users receive can become addictive-like.…”
Section: Summarizing the Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%