2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90089-6_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Argumentation as Exogenous Coordination

Abstract: Formal argumentation is one of the most popular approaches in modern logic and reasoning. The theory of abstract argumentation introduced by Dung in 1995 has shifted the focus from the internal structure of arguments to relations among arguments, and temporal dynamics for abstract argumentation was proposed by Barringer, Gabbay and Woods in 2005. In this tradition, we see arguments as reasoning processes, and the interaction among them as a coordination process. We argue that abstract argumentation can adopt i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baroni and Giacomin are the first to adopt a principle-based approach for classifying argumentation semantics [3], which was followed by other papers axiomatising abstract argumentation [40], preference-based argumentation [25] and agent argumentation [41]. There are papers that propose principles for bipolar ranking-based/gradual semantics [1], and their generalisations [5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baroni and Giacomin are the first to adopt a principle-based approach for classifying argumentation semantics [3], which was followed by other papers axiomatising abstract argumentation [40], preference-based argumentation [25] and agent argumentation [41]. There are papers that propose principles for bipolar ranking-based/gradual semantics [1], and their generalisations [5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the principles we introduce and use for analysing bipolar argumentation are in the same spirit as the principles used in the principle-based analysis of Dung's semantics [40]. For example, the robustness of argumentation semantics when adding or removing attacks plays a central role [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%