2013
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arguments against investing widely in robotic prostatectomy in Canada: a wrong focus on tool box rather than surgical expertise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data on preoperative erectile function were not available. The debate on the advantages of minimally invasive prostatectomy with respect to improving outcome is ongoing, yet convincing evidence is still lacking [ 14 ] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on preoperative erectile function were not available. The debate on the advantages of minimally invasive prostatectomy with respect to improving outcome is ongoing, yet convincing evidence is still lacking [ 14 ] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…American urologists have rapidly adopted robot-assisted minimally invasive radical prostatectomy, while Canadian urologists have embraced this technology in a more limited fashion, partly because of financial constraints within the Canadian healthcare system. 13,14 It is under this light that a BSTC, although challenging, is a requirement for a more widespread and safe acceptance of robotic surgery in Canadian institutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%