2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02446.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arguments against toxic effects of chemotherapy on liver injury and regeneration in an experimental model of partial hepatectomy

Abstract: Liver injury and liver regeneration are not impaired after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU, irinotecan, oxaliplatin and gemcitabine in non-tumoural liver parenchyma. In addition, combined treatments disclose no adverse effects on liver regeneration. Chemotherapy alone induces no histological alterations even in the presence of steatosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to clinical data presented here, experimental chemotherapy has not shown detrimental effects on hepatic regeneration [51].…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In contrast to clinical data presented here, experimental chemotherapy has not shown detrimental effects on hepatic regeneration [51].…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In this setting, and taking into account that liver cirrhosis is increasingly recognized as a procoagulant situation,16 one may speculate that an uncontrolled local liver response to irradiation may be favored by subclinical underlying liver damage or a prothrombotic milieu. Although an impaired regenerative ability caused by antiproliferative agents cannot be ruled out as an alternative explanation, it seems rather unlikely since chemotherapy has been shown not to alter liver regeneration in an animal model of 70% hepatectomy17 or in patients simultaneously submitted to portal vein embolization 18. The observation in our previous study that REILD was less frequent among elderly patients has been confirmed in this larger series, and the higher number of elderly patients treated in recent years may have accounted for the reduction in the incidence of REILD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few years, several attempts have been made to develop a murine model of oxaliplatin‐induced SOS. However, to date, none of these have been successful in inducing histological changes in the liver despite the administration of high doses of chemotherapy for prolonged periods . One potential explanation for this observation is found in early pharmacological studies conducted in healthy mice, which showed the spleen to be the primary organ to take up oxaliplatin and indicated that reduced concentrations are taken up by the liver .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%