2014
DOI: 10.1586/14737159.2014.893829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arguments in favor of HPV testing for cervical screening and post-treatment CIN2+ monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Netherlands is due to commence HPV primary screening in 2016,2 the American Society for Clinical Pathology recommend this approach for women >303 in the USA and several European countries including the UK have implementation projects underway.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Netherlands is due to commence HPV primary screening in 2016,2 the American Society for Clinical Pathology recommend this approach for women >303 in the USA and several European countries including the UK have implementation projects underway.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specificity of the HR-HPV-test is however lower than cytology 90.7% (90.4-91.1%) and 96.3% (96.1-96.5%), respectively [6]. The test provides information about whether or not a woman has an infection with a HR-HPV type, but it does not provide information on the degree of transformation of cervical cells [7]. If a woman has a PAP3A2 or worse, she will be referred to a gynecologist [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%