2021
DOI: 10.18502/acta.v59i10.7771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arhinia and Bilateral Anophthalmia: Report of a Rare Case and Review of Literature

Abstract: Arhinia is an extremely rare condition reported in less than 100 cases so far. We report a case of arhinia with bilateral anophthalmia. In physical examination, only alar portions of the nose were partially formed. No septal, lower, upper lateral cartilages or nasal bones were detectable. Both nostrils were atretic. The orbital area was covered with skin, and eyebrows were partially formed. Bilateral complete cleft lip and palate were evident. Surgical interventions should be considered not only for reconstruc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rosen called the absence of the nose alone arhinia and the absence of the nose along with the complete absence of the olfactory system total arhinia 7 . Arhinia is usually diagnosed after birth, however, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging may be helpful for prenatal diagnosis 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rosen called the absence of the nose alone arhinia and the absence of the nose along with the complete absence of the olfactory system total arhinia 7 . Arhinia is usually diagnosed after birth, however, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging may be helpful for prenatal diagnosis 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IM can present as a solitary myofibroma, a multicentric myofibroma in soft tissues, or a multicentric myofibroma with visceral involvement. Despite the fact that it is a relatively rare lesion, it can be found in the scalp, forehead, parotid region, and oral cavity [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chest X-ray is a less costly imaging choice and uses a lower radiation dose than CT, while virtually every health center and most clinics will have access to X-ray equipment [20][21][22]. Chest-X-ray, similar to CT, affords medical physicians with imaging symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 contamination, e.g., ground-glass opacity, but suffers from an increased rate of false-negative results [23][24][25]. Blood tests are broadly accessible and have much lower costs than RT-PCR and imaging tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%