2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-93-86279-40-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arithmetical Aspects of the Large Sieve Inequality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of authors (see [1,7,8]) have recently obtained upper bounds for the sum on the lefthand side of (2) from various points of view. These bounds are, however, comparable to that given by when P (T ) = T k , for any integer k 3, and when I is of the form (0, N] then the left-hand side of (2) is (N Q 2(1−1/k) + Q 2 )N 1+ sup 0<i N |a i | 2 under Hooley's hypothesis K * in the context of Waring's problem.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Let Q and K Be Integersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of authors (see [1,7,8]) have recently obtained upper bounds for the sum on the lefthand side of (2) from various points of view. These bounds are, however, comparable to that given by when P (T ) = T k , for any integer k 3, and when I is of the form (0, N] then the left-hand side of (2) is (N Q 2(1−1/k) + Q 2 )N 1+ sup 0<i N |a i | 2 under Hooley's hypothesis K * in the context of Waring's problem.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Let Q and K Be Integersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When indeed P (T ) is of degree 2 and the interval I is of the form (0, N], Ramaré's method, described in Section 5.4 of [7], gives the bound Q (N + Q g(Q ))(log 2 2Q ) 2 for the sum on the lefthand side of (2), where g(Q ) = exp(C log 2 Q log 3 Q ). Here log 2 Q and log 3 Q denote log log Q and log log log Q , respectively.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Let Q and K Be Integersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is prime to d, for all i from 1 to κ. We proposed some time ago (see [20] and [19]) a geometrical approach that dispenses with building an auxiliary polynomial, like Π (h1,••• ,hκ) above. The exposition will be made easier by the following definition.…”
Section: The Approach In the Largementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let M = lcm(d ≤ Q) and let us look at K M ⊂ Z/M Z. We assume momentarily that the compact set satisfies the Johnsen-Gallagher condition (see [6], [23], [20], [19]…”
Section: A Family Of Host Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the reason that we are unable to prove Theorem 1.2 for the primes, which would require type-II estimates in an inaccessible range, and also the reason that one saves no more than log X in the bound (1.1). In fact, to get this saving we use a quantitatively superior argument of Ramaré [16], which received a lot of attention recently [13,4] following its use in Matomäki and Radziwi l l's recent breakthrough [12]. Finally the required type-II estimates will be proved in Section 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%