2014
DOI: 10.9753/icce.v34.structures.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Armor Damage on Harbor-Side Rubble Mound of Composite Breakwaters Against Water Jet Caused by Impinging Bore-Like Tsunami

Abstract: A series of hydraulic model experiments was systematically and carefully carried out to estimate the stability of various types of armor units for a harbor-side rubble mound of a composite breakwater against a water jet caused by an impinging bore-like tsunami. Armor stones of weight 1 ton were seen to be easily removed by the tsunami flow. Flat type concrete blocks with well-arranged holes showed high stability. In the case of using wave-dissipating blocks, the total stability of the armor layer was enhanced … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the numerical computation of the tsunami overtopping the caisson, Maruyama et al [2012] adequately reproduced the laboratory experiment of an overtopping jet from tsunami by using the volume of fluid (VOF) method implemented in the OpenFOAM CFD model [OpenCFD Ltd., 2011]. In the case of the steady overflow of tsunami, however, the computation result using the VOF method did not reproduce well due to the excessive entrainment of air into the impinging jet.…”
Section: Computation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With regard to the numerical computation of the tsunami overtopping the caisson, Maruyama et al [2012] adequately reproduced the laboratory experiment of an overtopping jet from tsunami by using the volume of fluid (VOF) method implemented in the OpenFOAM CFD model [OpenCFD Ltd., 2011]. In the case of the steady overflow of tsunami, however, the computation result using the VOF method did not reproduce well due to the excessive entrainment of air into the impinging jet.…”
Section: Computation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Two dimensionless coefficients a 0 and b 0 are constants and determined according to experience. In this study, a 0 and b 0 were given as 1500 and 3.6, respectively, according to the past study [11]. In this simulation, a model of sandy seabed was ignored since it can be assumed that the permeability of sand is greatly lower than that of rubble mound and the seepage flow hardly occurs through the seabed.…”
Section: Overflow Simulations and Modeling Seepage Force In Demmentioning
confidence: 99%