1998
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.36.12.3590-3594.1998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Armored RNA Technology for Production of Ribonuclease-Resistant Viral RNA Controls and Standards

Abstract: The widespread use of sensitive assays for the detection of viral and cellular RNA sequences has created a need for stable, well-characterized controls and standards. We describe the development of a versatile, novel system for creating RNase-resistant RNA. “Armored RNA” is a complex of MS2 bacteriophage coat protein and RNA produced in Escherichia coli by the induction of an expression plasmid that encodes the coat protein and an RNA standard sequence. The RNA sequences are completely protected from RNase dig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
94
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
94
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to avoid the risk of crosscontamination and to include well defined internal controls with physical properties similar to those of the target of interest, it is recommended to spike the specimens with non-human, naturally occurring viruses (see below). Alternatively, the so-called ''armored RNA'' technology can be implemented as an internal control, where the samples investigated are spiked with a known concentration of a synthetic RNA standard protected from degradation by packaging in pseudoviral particles (Pasloske et al, 1998). In our laboratory, we use the phocine (=seal) herpes virus type 1 (PhHV) as a DNA virus control and the phocine distemper virus (PDV) as an RNA virus control (both were kindly provided to us by Niesters, Department of Virology, University Hospital Rotterdam, the Netherlands).…”
Section: Controls For False Positive and Negative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid the risk of crosscontamination and to include well defined internal controls with physical properties similar to those of the target of interest, it is recommended to spike the specimens with non-human, naturally occurring viruses (see below). Alternatively, the so-called ''armored RNA'' technology can be implemented as an internal control, where the samples investigated are spiked with a known concentration of a synthetic RNA standard protected from degradation by packaging in pseudoviral particles (Pasloske et al, 1998). In our laboratory, we use the phocine (=seal) herpes virus type 1 (PhHV) as a DNA virus control and the phocine distemper virus (PDV) as an RNA virus control (both were kindly provided to us by Niesters, Department of Virology, University Hospital Rotterdam, the Netherlands).…”
Section: Controls For False Positive and Negative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the same cDNA region was used to prepare ARC + based on a previously described procedure for MS2-phage-based ARPs (Cheng et al, 2006, Pasloske et al, 1998 with certain minor modifications. In brief, the PCR fragment containing the target region and additional flanking nucleotides (see above) was ligated into a linearized in-house plasmid vector containing the MS2 coat protein gene.…”
Section: Generation Of Positive-control Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they are not pathogenic during the experiment because these particles cannot replicate by themselves. Armored RNAs based on MS2 VLPs are now used for the detection of various viruses, such as human immunodeficiency virus (Pasloske et al, 1998), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (Drosten et al, 2001), enteroviruses (Beld et al, 2004;Donia et al, 2005), Avian influenza virus (Das et al, 2006), measles virus (Zhang et al, 2015a,b), and ebola virus .…”
Section: Other Roles Of Ms2 Vlpsmentioning
confidence: 99%