2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-1501-2_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arms Trade and Conflict Resolution: A Trade-Theoretic Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, the mechanism via which the war equilibrium is attained in this paper is fundamentally different from that in the exiting literature (e.g. Becsi and Lahiri, 2007b; Lahiri, 2009), and this is because the issue of blood diamonds comes with its own specific modelling strategy. The above results are summarized in the following P1 .…”
Section: The War Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this respect, the mechanism via which the war equilibrium is attained in this paper is fundamentally different from that in the exiting literature (e.g. Becsi and Lahiri, 2007b; Lahiri, 2009), and this is because the issue of blood diamonds comes with its own specific modelling strategy. The above results are summarized in the following P1 .…”
Section: The War Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These proportions along with the employment of soldiers are simultaneously determined in a Nash game. The model is closely related to that of Becsi and Lahiri (2007b) and Lahiri (2009), but with an important and significant difference. In those two papers, the conflict is over land, and the role of profits from the land is not explicitly treated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations